Dual Medicare-Medicaid Billing Problems

July 12th, 2018 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Categories:   Billing   Medicaid   Medicare   Reimbursement   CPT® Coding   Audits/Auditing  
0 Votes - Sign in to vote or comment.

It is important to keep in mind that Medicaid is run at a state level so there can be some differences when it comes to coverage. However, the rules regarding balance billing of covered services is set at the federal level. The law states (emphasis added):

A state plan must provide that the Medicaid agency must limit participation in the Medicaid program to providers who accept, as payment in full, the amounts paid by the agency plus any deductible, coinsurance or copayment required by the plan to be paid by the individual. - 42 CFR § 447.15 Acceptance of State payment as payment in full

According to this law (above), the only amounts you could collect from the patient for covered services, are the Medicare allowed deductible, coinsurance, and/or copayment. However, according to Medi-Cal’s Provider guidelines, you cannot do that. It states “Providers must not bill the recipient for private insurance cost-sharing amounts such as deductibles, coinsurance or copayments…”  Bottom line: you must carefully review your state law. Balance billing covered charges is always illegal.

Another important thing to check is whether or not the patient is enrolled in the Qualified Medicare Beneficiary (QMB) program. This is critical because if they are, it is illegal to bill them for any cost sharing (i.e., co-pays, deductibles, or co-insurance) on covered charges. You may bill Medicaid for these costs, but coverage is determined at the state level. Even if you are not enrolled as a Medicaid provider, you cannot bill the patient for these amounts. CMS recently released a MLN Matters (SE1128) on this subject because it is such a problem. CLICK HERE to learn more about the QMB program.

So the next question is, what do you do about noncovered charges?

When services are not covered by Medicaid (e.g., they exceed frequency limitations, considered experimental), a healthcare provider is allowed to enter into a written agreement with the patient where the patient agrees to pay out-of-pocket for the services. This written agreement is like the ABN for Medicare noncovered services. It must be completed on a Medicaid-approved form (click here to see Montana’s form), and be signed and dated by both the provider and patient BEFORE services are provided. Utah’s agreement is called “AGREEMENT OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY- MEDICAID” and Montana’s is called “CUSTOM AGREEMENT FOR MEDICAID NON-COVERED SERVICES.” Just do an internet search on “Medicaid non covered services waiver form” and include your state and you should be able to find yours.

Be aware that states can have additional requirements regarding noncovered services. For example, according to the Utah Medicaid Provider Manual, you may bill the patient for noncovered services only when all of the following limited circumstances are met:

A. The provider has an established policy for billing all patients for services not covered by a third party. (The charge cannot be billed only to Medicaid patients.)

B. The patient is advised prior to receiving a non-covered service that Medicaid will not pay for the service.

C. The patient agrees to be personally responsible for the payment.

D. The agreement is made in writing between the provider and the patient, which details the service and the amount to be paid by the patient.

Regardless of the state in which you reside, healthcare providers are required to let their patients know when a service is not covered by Medicaid BEFORE providing that service. Look up “non-covered services” in your state Medicaid provider manual to make sure you have all your bases covered.

###

Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us.  Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.


Latest articles:  (any category)

Coding for a Performance of an X-ray Service vs. Counting the Work as a Part of MDM
March 21st, 2022 - Stephanie Allard , CPC, CEMA, RHIT
When x-rays are audited on the same date as an E/M encounter we have one of three decisions to make about the work that went into the radiological exam when the practice owns x-ray equipment and does their own interpretations internally. First, we must determine whether the x-ray was...
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Systems: Leveraging Everyday Tech to Enhance Diabetes Management
March 16th, 2022 - Susan Gatehouse, RHIT, CCS,CPC, AHIMA-Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer
However, is the coding for the treatment and management of diabetes being adequately captured? Diabetes mellitus (DM) affects over 400 million people worldwide. It is a chronic disease of inadequate control of blood levels of glucose that affects the body’s ability to turn food into energy. Essentially, the...
ESRD Hemodialysis Hits Home with the New ETC Model
March 16th, 2022 - Aimee L. Wilcox, CPMA, CCS-P, CST, MA, MT
In 2021, two major ESRD programs became effective, essentially preparing to transform not only risk adjusted services, but also at-home dialysis, health equity among beneficiaries needing transplant services, and improved access to donor kidneys.
Refresh Your IV Hydration Coding Knowledge
March 16th, 2022 - Aimee L. Wilcox, CPMA, CCS-P, CST, MA, MT
Reporting IV infusion services can be complicated, especially when multiple infusions are reported in a single encounter. Take a few minutes to freshen up your knowledge on IV hydration coding with a review of the guidelines and a few coding scenarios.
Medicare Auditors Caught Double-Dipping
March 14th, 2022 - Edward Roche, PhD, JD
Overlapping extrapolations require providers to pay twice. Some Medicare auditors have been caught “double-dipping,” the practice of sampling and extrapolating against the same set of claims. This is like getting two traffic tickets for a single instance of running a red light. This seedy practice doubles the amount...
Cybersecurity & Ransomware Warnings
March 10th, 2022 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Content
Although HIPAA Security protocols have been in effect for some time, as technology advances, if we are not diligent, gaps can be left available for intruders. On top of that, on February 23, 2022, the American Hospital Association issued a cybersecurity advisory. They stated, “there is concern that Russia may retaliate against the U.S. and allied nations with disruptive cyberattacks.”
The Case of the Missing Signature
March 10th, 2022 - David M. Glaser, Esq.
It’s important to remember that Medicare manuals are not binding, and they can’t “require” anything, including signatures. Regulatory framework is constantly changing. Never assume you know all of the rules, even if you carefully study them all the time. New things are constantly appearing....



Home About Contact Terms Privacy

innoviHealth® - 62 E 300 North, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 - Phone 801-770-4203 (9-5 Mountain)

Copyright © 2000-2022 innoviHealth Systems®, Inc. - CPT® copyright American Medical Association