HCC - Acceptable Provider Interpretation for Diagnostic Testing
October 1st, 2018 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
The following table is taken from the Contract-Level Risk Adjustment Data Validation Medical Record Reviewer Guidance dated 2017-09-27 (see References). It is a listing of acceptable provider interpretation of diagnostic testing.
Diagnostic Testing (with or without interventional procedures)
with acceptable provider interpretation
Acceptable Examples include:
- Cardiology and Vascular Surgeons
- Echocardiogram (including Doppler, Duplex, Color flow of the heart vessels)
- EKG (electrocardiogram) – Stress test, Cardiac catheterization ◦ Myocardial perfusion and other nuclear medicine imaging of the heart
- Pacemaker analysis (non-telephonic)
- Vascular Doppler Study interpretation- not performed by Diagnostic Radiologists
- Percutaneous transluminal coronary angiography (PTCA) Interventional Radiology
- Catheter angiography – Coronary Computed tomography angiography (CTA)
- Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
- Embolization procedures
- Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL)
- Magnetic resonance arteriogram (MRA)
- Fluoroscopic Guidance
- Genitourinary vascular flow imaging (nuclear medicine)
- Radiofrequency ablation
- Radiation Therapy – Ultrasound Guidance Neurology
- Electroencephalography (EEG)
- Electromyography (EMG)
- Nerve Conduction Studies
- Nuclear Medicine Brain imaging
- Sleep Studies (Polysomnography) Pulmonology
- Pulmonary Function Tests (PFT) Pulmonary perfusion and ventilation imaging
Reviewers should only submit diagnoses documented in the physician interpretation, not the technical report. Do not submit records of diagnostic radiologist only.
If an exact diagnosis is not reported, and the record is identified as outpatient, apply outpatient coding guidelines to code the condition to the level of certainty documented. Often the reason for the test is listed as symptom or abnormal findings on another test. If the reason for the test is to rule out a diagnosis, do not report the diagnosis if the exam is normal or does not indicate the rule out diagnosis. The reviewer must use judgment based on the type of procedure/test or other documentation available when determining if a chief complaint or reason for a test is a current diagnosis or was a condition to be ruled out.
MRA, reason for test: non-healing ulcer. MRA studies rule out vascular or heart disease, not ulcers. The ulcer would be reported as a current condition along with any abnormal findings of the study.
Interpreted diagnostic testing within inpatient records: See guidance for Other Physician Documentation. Generally, interpretations from acceptable provider specialties are acceptable as long as there is no contradiction with the attending physician diagnosis.
Diagnoses documented in EKGs, MRA, Doppler studies, and other testing must be addressed by the attending physician or consulting provider to submit for condition validation.
RADV Auditor Action
Researched on a case-by-case basis to determine if study is performed by a Diagnostic Radiologist or a valid physician specialist, such as Vascular Surgeon or Cardiologist.
Stand-alone/outpatient EKG interpretations are considered for reporting on a case-by-case basis.
The cardiologist signature must be present and the results supported in the clinical notes.
Findings are often “suggestive of” and not confirmed diagnoses. This is especially true for “Old MI (myocardial Infarction)” findings since false positive findings are not uncommon.
If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us. Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.
Latest articles: (any category)Reporting Drug Wastage with Modifier JW and NEW Modifier JZAugust 15th, 2023 - Aimee Wilcox
Modifier JW has been around since 2003 with changes in Medicare policies to ensure standard utilization in 2017; however, because of a continued lack of reporting consistency, Medicare has created and implemented policy related to reporting a new modifier, JZ. How does this impact Medicare reimbursement and why is this modifier so important?Finding Patterns of Complexity in the Medical Decision Making (MDM) Table August 8th, 2023 - Aimee Wilcox
Changes to the Medical Decision Making (MDM) Table in 2023 reflect the work performed in the facility setting in addition to the work involved in Evaluation and Management (E/M) scoring in other places of service. Taking the time to really look closely at the MDM Table and identify patterns in wording and scoring helps coders to understand scoring in an easier way.Seven Reasons to Standardize Medical RecordsJuly 18th, 2023 - Aimee Wilcox
The standardization of medical records offers numerous benefits for healthcare systems, providers, and patients. By ensuring interoperability, improved workflows, better patient safety, supporting research endeavors, and optimizing resource allocation, standardized records contribute to improved efficiency, quality of care and especially patient outcomes. Here are seven reasons to standardize medical records.Advancements in Coding Hospital Observation Care Services in 2023July 4th, 2023 - Aimee Wilcox
Hospitals are increasingly adopting innovative solutions to improve patient care and optimize processes and many of these solutions follow immediately the recent CPT and Medicare coding changes. In 2023 coding of hospital observation care services underwent significant changes enabling healthcare providers to accurately document and bill for the sick or injured patient that requires a higher level of medical services between the emergency room care and hospital admission. This article explores the key changes in coding hospital observation care services and their impact on healthcare delivery.Be Aware — Emergency Department Visits Under OIG ScrutinyJune 20th, 2023 - Wyn Staheli
Every year the Department of Health & Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) creates an official work plan giving everyone a heads up as to what they are going to be reviewing. The 2022 Work Plan stated that they would be reviewing claims for Evaluation & Management services provided in an emergency department (ED) setting.OIG Audit Reveals Diagnosis Reporting Problems Affecting Risk Adjustment ScoringJune 15th, 2023 - Wyn Staheli
The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) recently published their Spring 2023 Semiannual Report to Congress. This report contained some diagnoses reporting issues that all providers need to be aware of. They focused on several groups of diagnoses that they considered “High-Risk” for being miscoded. Several states were included in the report and the types of errors for all can be generally grouped into several categories.Documenting for Suture and Staple Removal E/M Add-On CodesMay 30th, 2023 - Aimee Wilcox
Historically, the 10-day and 90-day global periods would include the patient's follow-up Evaluation and Management (E/M) services and any dressing changes or staple/suture removal related to the surgery; however, following a closer analysis of these and other surgery codes, the decision was made to make significant revisions to these codes to ensure proper reporting.