Auditing Therapy Evaluation Codes - Not So Quick!

Categories:   CPT^® Coding   Audits/Auditing   Evaluation & Management (E/M)   Physical Medicine|Physical Therapy  

New evaluation codes for physical therapy (PT) and occupational  therapy (OT) codes were made effective 1/1/2017. Three new physical therapy evaluation codes replaced 97001, and three new occupational evaluation codes replaced 97003.

The change from a single evaluation code for both PT and OT to tiered codes that are somewhat similar in nature to Evaluation & Management codes (E&M) may be confusing. Therapists and coders who review documentation and select the appropriate tiered code are often not clear on the elements and criteria for determining proper code selection. Auditors that review therapy documentation for the purpose of audit, investigation and/or claim adjudication are mistakenly making determinations based solely on time. Therapists working in multidisciplinary settings are often not clear on the difference between the PT and OT evaluation criteria. Therapists often admit that they base their code selection on time.

With a little over a year of experience with the new codes, a number of problems and concerns are present, and the most frequent questions are:

A1.  While the PT and OT evaluation codes appear to be similar to E & M codes, the following guidance was issued in the CPT Assistant: "The definition of terms in the Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation section are not the same as those in the Evaluation and Management Services section (99201-99350). Do not use the Definitions of Commonly Used Terms in the Evaluation and Management (E/M) Guidelines for physical medicine and rehabilitation services."[i] 

Q2.  How is the time component computed in determining code selection?

A2.  The codes descriptions include "typical time" for each of the codes. However, time is not a determinant in code selection. A physical therapy evaluation that takes 30 minutes can still be classified as a high complexity evaluation if all non-time criteria meet the code definition. The CPT Assistant provides this guidance: "The physical therapy evaluation and re-evaluation codes are service-based codes. The typical time associated with the code descriptors are for guidance only and should not be used to determine the level of complexity."[ii] 

Q3.  Do all the elements of the code have to be at the same level?

A3.  All requirement of code must be met. For example, if a patient presents with multiple personal factors and comorbidities, and the evaluation addresses 1-2 body systems, with moderation decision making for the plan of care, but has a stable clinical presentation, the code selection would meet low complexity, rather than moderate complexity.

Q4.  Are the same criteria used for PT and OT code selection?

A4.  The PT and OT criteria are utilizing different elements and criteria. The basis for the OT evaluation is the OT Framework, 3rd edition.[iii] 

Below is a summary chart of the training materials generally used by the therapy organizations in rolling out coding education.[iv] Chart 2 contains criteria for the use of the PT evaluation codes, Chart 3 contains criteria for use of the OT evaluation codes.

 

For further insight into the PT and OT evaluation codes, review your favorite CPT coding reference book. Both the American Physical Therapy Association[v] and the American Occupational Therapy Association[vi] have provided references on their websites.

---

We constantly hear how AI is creeping into every aspect of healthcare but what does that mean for medical coders and how can we better understand the language used in the codeset? Will AI take my place or will I learn with it and become an integral part of the process that uses AI to enhance my abilities? 

Medical coding contractors offer a valuable service to healthcare providers who would rather outsource coding and billing rather than handling things in-house. Some contractors are better than others, but there is one thing they all have in common: the need to present some sort of value proposition in order to land new clients. As a contractor, your value proposition is the advantage you offer. And that advantage is specialization.

Chronic respiratory disease is on the top 10 chronic disease list published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Although it is a chronic condition, it may be stable for some time and then suddenly become exacerbated and even impacted by another acute respiratory illness, such as bronchitis, RSV, or COVID-19. Understanding the nuances associated with the condition and how to properly assign ICD-10-CM codes is beneficial.

According to the FDA, CDC, and other alphabet soup entities, the old COVID-19 vaccines are no longer able to treat the variants experienced today so new vaccines have been given the emergency use authorization to take the place of the old vaccines. No sooner was the updated 2024 CPT codebook published when 50 of the codes in it were deleted, some of which were being newly added for 2024.

With approximately 250,000 cases of acute appendicitis diagnosed annually in the United States, coding updates were made to ensure high-specificity coding could be achieved when reporting these diagnoses. While appendicitis almost equally affects both men and women, the type of appendicitis varies, as dose the risk of infection, sepsis, and perforation.

COVID vaccine changes due to the end of the PHE as of November 1, 2023 are addressed in this article.

2023 brought quite a few changes to Evaluation and management (E/M) services. The significant revisions as noted in the CPT codebook were welcome changes to bring other E/M services more in line with the changes that took place with Office or Other Outpatient Services a few years ago. As part of CMS’ Medicare Learning Network, the “Evaluation and Management Services Guide” publication was finally updated as of August 2023 to include the changes that took place in 2023. If you take a look at the new publication (see references below),....