What Does It Mean To Scrub An Insurance Claim?

December 29th, 2015 - David Greene, MD
Categories:   Claims   Coding   CPT® Coding   Diagnosis Coding   Insurance   Medicare   Modifiers   National Coverage Determinations (NCD)   Surgical Billing & Coding  
0 Votes - Sign in to vote or comment.

 

During the rigorous training physicians undergo to learn their craft, very little education is received on how to deal with submitting claims to insurance companies.  It’s unfortunately a necessary evil, as surgeons who contract with insurance companies rely on that reimbursement as the lifeblood for practice survival.

 

Receiving payment from insurance payers involves submitting claims after providing treatment.  Whether it’s in an office setting, emergency room, or an operating room, filing a claim involves supplying the appropriate procedure and diagnosis codes along with any appropriate modifiers pertaining to the treatment performed.  However, simply filing a claim does not assure that it will in fact be paid.

 

The policies of insurance companies for accepting or rejecting claims change often. A claim that got paid last month may be currently denied without notice depending on carrier specific modifications.  This results in a large batch of denied claims for surgeons performing many of the same procedures.  Not only is it confusing for a practice to attempt following up on these adjustments, it can result in lengthy days in accounts receivables along with rollercoaster collection periods.

 

Is there a secret weapon orthopedic surgeons can use to assist with streamlining claims to maximize acceptance?  That’s where claim “scrubbing” enters the picture.  The term “scrubbing” refers to an intricate cleaning of a claim prior to submission.  Over the past 10 years, automated claims editing has been developed which helps to validate that a claim is appropriate and accurate for submission.

 

There are two components in scrubbing claims.  As the most common error for denied claims is data entry errors, the patient demographic data is reviewed for the most common mistakes.  For instance, keying in an incorrect procedure code that is age specific would make the claim invalid, and the scrubber flags those types of errors for correction prior to submission.  This is the easy part of the automation. (Figure 1)

 

The complicated portion of scrubbing involves a thorough review of the codes and modifiers to ensure complicity with carrier specific guidelines. This is commonly referred



to as the “rules engine.”  In some fashion, every data element of the claim is analyzed. If a physician submits a claim for a hysterectomy and the scrubber sees a male gender it will obviously be flagged.  The scrubber verifies that a procedure performed is associated with a diagnosis code that justifies the medical necessity of that procedure along with variables such as gender, age, date and place of service and any required modifiers.  The complexity of scrubbing should not be underestimated.  By the time one multiplies the total number of Medicare local and national coverage determinations, along with data from the Correct Coding Initiative (CCI), ICD-9 codes, and modifiers the potential numbers of editable combinations surpasses ten million. Advanced claim scrubbers, though, can review about ten claims per second.

 

By including national and local coverage determinations from all of the Medicare geographical regions in every state along with data from the Correct Coding Initiative (CCI), approximately 35% of existing CPT® codes are represented as a baseline in claims editing programs.  There is no Medicare medical necessity guidelines for the remaining 65% of codes, therefore claim scrubber software companies hire clinicians and nurses who work full time evaluating up to the minute medical necessity data posted by insurance carriers around the country on their website as mandated by law. In addition, procedure codes are matched with all feasible diagnosis codes that are believed to be clinically defensible for claim acceptance. As one might expect, this is a costly endeavor so most claim scrubbing software companies license this portion from the few companies performing the research.

 

So how good are existing claim scrubbers?  There’s a wide range available, either as a standalone product or integrated with practice management software. Often the billing company utilized will incorporate a scrubber. The best ones will routinely achieve over 95% claim acceptance on the first pass. Practices who were previously performing manual edits typically find that after instituting the technology the scrubber flags over 30% of claims. This means about 30% potential claim denial prior to scrubbing, which drags out the revenue cycle. By having the scrubber flagging problem claims, changes can then be made instantly prior to submission, rather than waiting weeks for a denial.  As a result, the practice will see more reimbursement and receive those funds faster.  There will also be less back-end work secondary to denied claims.

 

Can relying on an experienced coder achieve the same acceptance rate?  In all likelihood, No.  As mentioned, scrubbers check demographic information along with the codes. Also, if a payer changes a filing guideline on its claim form or a medical necessity requirement, a certified coder would probably not be aware of it in a timely fashion.  If a surgeon is contracted with a large amount of carriers, the chances of being subjected to rejected claims increases dramatically without a way of continually monitoring these myriad and often complex requirements.

 

Embracing an advanced claim scrubber, whether directly or indirectly, will allow one’s practice to effectively combat the convoluted world of insurance claim rules and regulations.  Practices that incorporate claim scrubbing rarely move away from the process.  When the bottom line receives a significant boost along with peace of mind from knowing the latest technology is in their back pocket, why would they?

 

Dr. David Greene is a residency and fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeon. He serves as the Director of Medical Relations for SilverTree Health, a full service medical insurance reimbursement company.

 

Contact information:  dgreene@silvertreehealth.com  or (877) 652-8733

###

Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us.  Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.


Latest articles:  (any category)

Where is the CCI Edit with Modifier 25 on E/M?
May 20th, 2020 - Christine Woolstenhulme, QCC, CMCS, CPC, CMRS
If you are not seeing a CCI edit when reporting an E/M code with a certain procedure, it may be that there is no edit. CMS does not have a CCI edit for every CPT code, however, there are still general coding rules that must be followed.  The use of Modifier 25 is one example ...
Packaging and Units for Billing Drugs
May 18th, 2020 - Christine Woolstenhulme, QCC, CMCS, CPC, CMRS
To determine the dosage, size, doses per package and how many billing units are in each package, refer to the NDC number. Take a look at the following J1071 - Injection, testosterone cypionate, 1mg For example; using NCD # 0009-0085-10 there are 10 doses of 100 mL (100 mg/mL = 1 mL and there are ...
Getting Your Practice Back on Track
May 12th, 2020 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
As we begin returning back to work, we will all face a new normal. The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the face of business. While it has certainly been a challenge to keep up with the ever-changing regulations (that’s likely to continue for a little longer), exciting new opportunities have also been created, such as the expansion of telemedicine. There’s also the maze of government funding that needs to be navigated and an increased awareness of OSHA standards to implement.
ICD-10-CM - Supplement information for E-Cigarette/Vaping Reporting
May 5th, 2020 - Christine Woolstenhulme, QCC, CMCS, CPC, CMRS
The CDC has released additional information and coding guidance for reporting encounters related to the 2019 health care encounters and deaths related to e-cigarette, or vaping, product use associated lung injury (EVALI).  The update offers coding scenarios for general guidance, poisoning and toxicity, substance abuse and signs and symptoms.  ICD-10-CM Official Coding Guidelines - ...
Additional Telehealth Changes Announced by CMS
May 4th, 2020 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
On April 30, 2020, CMS announced additional sweeping changes to meet the challenges of providing adequate healthcare during this pandemic. These changes expand the March 31st changes. The article covers some of the key changes. See the official announcement in the references below.
Effective Risk Adjustment Requires Accurate Calculations
April 27th, 2020 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Risk adjustment is simply a way of making sure that there are sufficient funds to adequately take care of the healthcare needs of a certain population. It’s a predictive modeling methodology based on the diagnoses of the individuals in that population. As payers move to value based models, they heavily rely on risk adjustment to ensure proper funding.
COVID-19 Clinical Trial Participation Helps Providers Earn MIPS Credit
April 22nd, 2020 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
All healthcare providers who are currently participating in the MIPS portion of Medicare’s Quality Payment Program may want to participate in the new COVID-19 Clinical Trials improvement activity. Read more about it here.



Home About Contact Terms Privacy

innoviHealth® - 62 E 300 North, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 - Phone 801-770-4203 (9-5 Mountain)

Copyright © 2000-2020 innoviHealth Systems®, Inc. - CPT® copyright American Medical Association