Not Documented, Not Done: Medicare Myth or Rule?

Categories:   Audits/Auditing   Claims   Documentation Guidelines  

After years of unchallenged recitation, the coding community has virtually canonized the phrase “not documented—not done” into coding scripture. But there are good reasons to question whether the now-famous epigram reflects an actual rule or whether it has simply taken on a life of its own like other “urban myths.”

 

In a 2008 article that retains relevance to coders today, Michael D. Miscoe, CPC, CHCC, noted that thorough documentation has become the de facto requirement to support claims for reimbursement by government and private payors. But an objective investigation into Medicare rules and their supporting statutes won’t support the common belief that “not documented—not done” is a legitimate rule, he argued in the Journal of Medical Practice Management.

By a strict interpretation of Medicare rules, lacking documentation does not render a medical service noncompensable. The Social Security Act itself mandates no payment “unless there has been furnished such information as may be necessary in order to determine the amounts due” (42 U.S.C. §139(e). A “clean” claim with the proper ICD-9 and HCPCS codes and appropriate fees fulfills this requirement.

Recent case law further supports this conclusion: The federal court ruled against the U.S. in a False Claims Act (U.S. ex rel Sikkenga v. Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield of Utah) case and reasserted that the Medicare statute only imposes an information requirement and “not a particular content requirement.”

Not So Fast!

A wary practice manager may want to hide this information from certain providers within his or her organization. Many group practices include physicians who reluctantly scrawl the briefest of “notes” for office encounters—sometimes inadequate for recording and communicating what happened during the visit. They sometimes hide behind a cavalier attitude summed up with, “ . . . I know what I did!”

Just because a strict interpretation of the law may extract some of the teeth from “not documented—not done,” that doesn’t reduce the need for good, accurate, and thorough documentation. Quality patient care includes maintaining a record that allows anyone with a legitimate reason to pick up the chart to understand the patient’s history of diagnosis and treatment.

Average physicians see thousands of patients each year. Regardless of claims to the contrary, a documentation-averse provider seldom possesses memory skills capable of recalling unwritten details years later.

Although the OIG’s own audit manual names documentation as only one of four types of “evidence” to determine whether a particular service was performed and properly reimbursed, why put auditors, your practice, and yourself through substantial anguish to prove your case? Doesn’t it make much more sense to document well?

COVID vaccine changes due to the end of the PHE as of November 1, 2023 are addressed in this article.

2023 brought quite a few changes to Evaluation and management (E/M) services. The significant revisions as noted in the CPT codebook were welcome changes to bring other E/M services more in line with the changes that took place with Office or Other Outpatient Services a few years ago. As part of CMS’ Medicare Learning Network, the “Evaluation and Management Services Guide” publication was finally updated as of August 2023 to include the changes that took place in 2023. If you take a look at the new publication (see references below),....

When EKGs are performed in the facility setting or even in the physician's office, what are the requirements for reporting the service and who gets credit for scoring data points for Evaluation and Management (E/M) medical decision making (MDM)? Let's take a look at a few coding scenarios related to EKG services to get a better understanding of why this can be problematic.

Coders often find themselves unsure of when to report a sign or symptom code documented in the medical record. Some coders find their organization has an EHR that requires a working diagnosis, which is usually a sign or symptom, be entered to order a test or diagnostic study or image. Understanding the guidelines surrounding when signs and symptoms should be reported is the first step in correct coding so let's take a look at some scenarios.

Diabetes is a chronic disease that just seems to consistently be increasing instead of improving resulting in a constant endeavor by medical researchers to identify causal effects and possible treatments. One underlying or precipitating condition that scientists have identified as a precipitating factor in the development of diabetes is insulin resistance, which is a known metabolic disorder. As data becomes available through claims reporting, additional code options become possible with ICD-10-CM.

Sometimes we receive questions regarding documentation requirements for specific codes or coding requirements and we respond with information and resources to support our answers. The following question was recently submitted: Are providers required to report postoperative services on claims using 99024, especially if there is no payment for that service? What documentation is required if you are reporting an unrelated Evaluation and Management (E/M) service by the same physician during the postoperative period? 

Gastroesophageal reflux disease or GERD for short, is a disease that impacts millions of Americans on a weekly basis. Symptoms are uncomfortable, as are some of the tests used to diagnose it, but understanding the disease, tests, and treatments helps us better understand how to code the disease using ICD-10-CM codes.