Medical Necessity is not Medical Decision Making

June 1st, 2015 - Codapedia Editor
Categories:   Documentation Guidelines   Evaluation & Management (E/M)   Medicare  
0 Votes - Sign in to vote or comment.

I can count on two consistent issues in coding audits.  Doctors report that their patients are, in general, sicker than patients in other practices. Coders report that their physicians are, in general, worse documenters than physicians in other practices and select codes that are too high based on the volume of the documentation without considering the medical necessity for the visit.  Because medical necessity is hard to define, some compliance policies mandate that medical decision making be used as a substitute for medical necessity.   As a frequent arbiter to these discussions and an experienced E/M auditor, I am uniquely positioned to comment on this topic.

The most often quoted reference in the discussion comes from the Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Chapter 12 Section 30.

 

Medical necessity of a service is the overarching criterion for payment in addition to the individual requirements of a CPT® code. It would not be medically necessary or appropriate to bill a higher level of evaluation and management service when a lower level of service is warranted. The volume of documentation should not be the primary influence upon which a specific level of service is billed.

 

It is brief and to the point, but provides no mechanism to operationalize the guidance.  It relies solely on physician’s or coder’s judgment.  For this joint pain, how much of an exam was needed? For that throbbing headache, what systems needed to be reviewed? What part of the volume of the detail was medically necessary for the physician to document and what part of the volume of detail was simply the doctor aiming for a higher level of code? Or just using the tool--the electronic health record—provided?  The spirit of the guidance is clear but the interpretation is based on judgment.

The Documentation Guidelines themselves and the audit tools that sprang up after the guidelines were released provide a more objective tool in auditing an E/M note. Using these tools, the level of service is based upon the key components of history, exam and medical decision-making.  Some codes require all of the three components and audit to the level of the lowest component.  Some services require only two of the three key components.  Of course, the CPT® book defines an E/M service as having seven components (history, exam and medical decision making are the three key components; most audit sheets have time as the fourth. Counseling coordination of care, and the nature of the presenting problem are the final three components.) The CPT® book includes charts for all E/M services in which the nature of the presenting problem is listed.  It also states that counseling coordination of care at the nature presenting problem are considered "contributory factors in the majority of encounters.”

The CPT® book devotes a section to describing the five types of presenting problems, which are defined as minimal, self-limited or minor, low, moderate or high.  Within the Tabular listing of E/M codes, CPT® assigns a type of presenting problem to each level of service.  For example, for 99203, usually the presenting problem (s) are of moderate severity. CPT® describes moderate severity (in the E/M Services Guidelines section of the book) as “A problem where the risk of morbidity without treatment is moderate; there is moderate risk of mortality without treatment; uncertain prognosis OR increased probability of prolonged functional impairment.”

The medical necessity for performing the key components of history and exam are determined by the nature of the presenting problem, the patient's own personal history and the clinical judgment of the provider. The medical decision making, that is the diagnostics ordered, the assessment and the plan are formulated as a result of the nature of the presenting problem, the patient’s past medical history, and the history and exam performed at that visit.  Medical decision-making is the outcome of the visit and is not a substitute for medical necessity. If CMS had wanted medical decision making to be that substitute then the Medicare Claims Processing Manual would read, “medical decision-making is the overarching criterion in selecting an E/M service” instead of medical necessity.  If CMS had wanted medical decision making to be a substitute for medical necessity than either medical decision-making would be required in determining the code or all codes would require all three components.

 Physicians do need to use their electronic health records in a way that more clearly documents what happened at the visit. In most cases that means document what would have been dictated, and be prudent in copying and clicking.  Length of note doesn’t win a prize. Coders need to recognize the difference between the medical necessity of performing a history and exam based upon the nature of the presenting problem and the patient's condition and medical decision making that is the clinical outcome of the encounter.  Organizations should seriously consider how policies and incentives are effecting coding for E/M services.

###

Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us.  Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.


Latest articles:  (any category)

How to Combat COVID-Related Risk Adjustment Losses with the Medicare Annual Wellness Exam
April 12th, 2021 - Aimee Wilcox, CPMA, CCS-P, CST, MA, MT, Director of Content
Identifying new ways to encourage Medicare beneficiaries to schedule and attend their Annual Wellness Exam (AWE) can be difficult, but the Open Enrollment period is a prime time for every payer to identify new beneficiaries and provide a reminder to both new and existing patients that this preventive service does ...
Failure to Follow Payer’s Clinical Staff Rules Costs Provider $273K
April 12th, 2021 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Clinical staff (e.g., LPN, RN, MA) provide essential services which allow providers to leverage their time and improve reimbursement opportunities and run their practices more efficiently. There is, however, an ongoing question of how to appropriately bill for clinical staff time. This is really a complex question which comes down to code descriptions, federal or state licensure, AND payer policies. Failure to understand licensing and payer policies led a Connecticut provider organization down a path that ended in a $273,000 settlement with both federal and state governments.
Properly Reporting Imaging Overreads (Including X-Rays)
April 8th, 2021 - Aimee Wilcox CPMA, CCS-P, CST, MA, MT and Wyn Staheli, Director of Content Research
hile many provider groups offer some imaging services in their offices, others may rely on external imaging centers. When the provider reviews images performed by an external source (e.g., independent imaging center), that is typically referred to as an overread or a re-read. Properly reporting that work depends on a variety of factors as discussed in this article.
How Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) Data Enhances Risk Adjustment
March 31st, 2021 - Aimee Wilcox, CPMA, CCS-P, CST, MA, MT, Director of Content
The role of SDOH in overall patient care and outcomes has become a more common topic of discussion among healthcare providers, payers, and policymakers alike. All are attempting to identify and collect SDOH and correlate the data to patient management which is increasingly seen as necessary to address certain health disparities and identify exactly how SDOH affects patient health outcomes. Learn how to address this important subject.
Understanding Skin Biopsy Codes
March 23rd, 2021 - Christine Woolstenhulme, QCC, QMCS, CPC, CMRS
A biopsy is a procedure to obtain only a portion of a lesion for a pathologic exam. According to the AMA, "The use of a biopsy procedure code (e.g., 11102, 11103) indicates that the procedure to obtain tissue for pathologic examination was performed independently, or was unrelated or distinct from other ...
How Reporting E/M Based on Time May Lose Money
March 18th, 2021 - Aimee Wilcox, CPMA, CCS-P, CST, MA, MT, Director of Content
Just like math teachers who require students to show their work so they can see how the student reached their answer, providers are also required to "show their work" through the documentation process in the medical record. By the time a provider has reviewed the patient's subjective complaints (i.e., patient's ...
COVID-19 Vaccines
March 10th, 2021 - Christine Woolstenhulme, QCC, QMCS, CPC, CMRS
To accommodate the new COVID-19 immunizations the CPT editorial panel has approved 11 Category I codes. Watch for new and revised guidelines and parenthetical notes with these codes. For example; which administration codes should be used with the vaccine codes and the NCD codes applicable to the dose being administered. These ...



Home About Contact Terms Privacy

innoviHealth® - 62 E 300 North, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 - Phone 801-770-4203 (9-5 Mountain)

Copyright © 2000-2021 innoviHealth Systems®, Inc. - CPT® copyright American Medical Association