Codapedia is now a division of Find-A-Code

Pre-op visits: True or False?

December 29th, 2015 - Codapedia Editor
Categories:   Coding   Compliance   Evaluation & Management (E/M)   Modifiers   Surgical Billing & Coding  
0 Votes - Sign in to vote or comment.

Are the following statements true or false?

• The PCP cannot be paid to do a pre-op assessment of a Medicare patient prior to surgery because of the new consult rules.

• The surgeon can never be paid to do a pre-op visit if s/he is going to take the patient to surgery.

• The surgeon can bill and be paid for an office visit for the purposes of a pre-op H&P after the decision for surgery is made, but before the surgery itself, if the hospital requires it.

All of these statements are false!

Let’s take them one by one:

      The PCP cannot be paid to do a pre-op assessment of a Medicare patient prior to surgery because of the new consult rules.

This is false. The primary care provider may be paid to do a medically necessary pre-operative assessment on a Medicare patient prior to surgery, but the visit is billed with a new or established patient visit code. For that matter, a cardiologist or pulmonologist can also bill for these services. The important thing: the visits must be medically necessary for the patient. Routine or screening services are not payable.

     The surgeon can never be paid to do a pre-op visit if s/he is going to take the patient to surgery.

This is false. The global surgical payment does include payment for pre-operative services, intra-operative service and post-operative care. The Medicare Fee Schedule includes the percentages for each component for each surgical CPT® code. The pre-operative care is roughly 10%, depending on the service.

When can the surgeon be paid for a pre-op visit?

• For the evaluation of the problem, if the procedure is not done that day or the next day.

• For the evaluation of the problem, if it is a minor procedure with a zero or ten day global period, when the Evaluation and Management service is a significant, separately identifiable service, meeting the criteria for using modifier 25. For example, a gynecologist is asked to see a patient with abnormal bleeding, and decides to do an endometrial biopsy on the same day. Both services may be reported and should be paid.

• For the evaluation of a problem, if it is a major procedure with a 90 day global period, and the physician decides at that visit to take the patient to surgery that day or the next day. If the visit meets the requirements for the use of modifier 57, it is a separately reportable (and payable) service.

There are articles in Codapedia about the use modifier 25 and modifier 57.

        The surgeon can bill and be paid for an office visit for the purposes of a pre-op H&P after the decision for surgery is made, but before the surgery itself, if the hospital requires it.

This is false. Some surgeons believe they can bill for a visit after the decision for surgery was made and before the surgery for the purpose of the H&P, completing the consent forms and educating the patients about what to expect. This is not a separately payable service and should not be billed.

The CPT® Assistant in May of 2009 answered this question specifically. Here is a quote from their newsletter:  

 If the surgeon sees a patient and makes a decision for surgery and then the patient returns for a visit where the intent of the visit is the preoperative H&P, and this service occurs in the interval between the decision-making visit and the day of surgery, regardless of when the visit occurs (1 day, 3 days, or 2 weeks), the visit is not separately billable as it is included in the surgical package.

###

Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us.  Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.


Latest articles:  (any category)

Patients Over Paperwork?! We have Great News!
July 18th, 2018 - Chris Woolstenhulme, QCC, CMCS, CPC, CMRS
Spend more time with patients and less time documenting? Great Concept! Document meaningful information? Sound good? CMS is proposing just that! CMS released a new proposal July 12, 2018, focused on streamlining clinician billing and expanding access to high-quality care. The goal is to improve and restore the doctor-patient relationship, modernize Medicare ...
Understanding the Level of Preventative Services (Grades and Suggestions)
July 17th, 2018 - Chris Woolstenhulme, QCC, CMCS, CPC, CMRS
It is essential for providers, clinicians, and other users to understand the importance of providing preventative services.  The U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) has recommendations and has applied Grade Definitions as a suggested resource to imply the significance and strength of preventative services.  The following definitions apply to recommendations ...
Attention Providers - Please Make Time to Read this Letter
July 17th, 2018 - Chris Woolstenhulme, QCC, CMCS, CPC, CMRS
In an effort to show CMS is committed to changing the rules to accommodate their providers CMS released a letter to Doctors of Medicare Beneficiaries. The letter offers encouragement and a promise to reduce the burden of unnecessary rules and requirements. The letter states “President Trump has made it clear that ...
CMS Proposed New E/M Codes for Podiatry
July 16th, 2018 - Chris Woolstenhulme, QCC, CMCS, CPC, CMRS
According to CMS changes are coming for E/M codes.  A recent proposal from CMS stated: "The E/M visit code set is outdated and needs to be revised and revalued." Since podiatry tends to furnish a lower level of E/M visits, CMS is proposing new G-codes to report E/M office/outpatient visits. The proposed ...
Dual Medicare-Medicaid Billing Problems
July 12th, 2018 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
It is important to keep in mind that Medicaid is run at a state level so there can be some differences when it comes to coverage. However, the rules regarding balance billing of covered services is set at the federal level. The law states (emphasis added): A state plan must provide ...
Small Practices are Affected by MIPS Increased Thresholds
June 25th, 2018 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
We recently heard about a small practice that had been faithfully submitting all the required “G” codes for the Quality Payment Program (QPP) only to discover that for 2018 they are excluded from MIPS because the low volume threshold increased from $30,000 in Part B allowed charges or 100 Part ...
How Does the Physician Compare Website Affect You?
June 25th, 2018 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
The physician compare website may not be working quite the way you think it is. Not all providers will have rankings showing up for them. Physician compare lists basic information, but quality measure information was not added until this year (2018) and not all quality measures are included in the ...



About Codapedia & Find-A-Code Contact Us Terms of Use Privacy Policy Advertise with Us

Codapedia™/Find-A-Code™ - 62 E 300 North, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 - Phone 801-770-4203 (9-5 Mountain) - Fax (801) 770-4428

Copyright © 2009-2018 Find A Code, LLC - CPT® copyright American Medical Association