Not Following the Rules Costs Chiropractor $5 Million

September 1st, 2020 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Categories:   Chiropractic   Audits/Auditing   Compliance   DME|Supplies|Equipment   HCPCS Coding  
0 Votes - Sign in to vote or comment.

Every healthcare office needs to know and understand the rules that apply to billing services and supplies. According to the false claims lawsuit, code L8679 “Implantable neurostimulator, pulse generator, any type” was billed for a device which was really P-stim, a form of acupuncture. According to court documents, a P-Stim is an electric acupuncture device that is attached to the ears of the patient using two small pads whereas code L8679 describes a product surgically implanted into a patient.

This is not the first time that the OIG has gone after healthcare providers and organizations for inappropriately billing this particular device. In September 2019, another doctor was ordered to pay $178,000 for inappropriately billing for P-stim using the same code (L8679). In fact, the OIG press release stated that “[t]he investigation into others involved in this scheme remains ongoing.” There are several key points that providers need to understand.

A Scheme is a Scheme

Currently, Medicare will only reimburse a chiropractor for chiropractic manipulative treatment. This particular doctor, in order to get around that rule, worked with a consulting company to basically ‘rent’ a medical director and Family Nurse Practitioner from them in order to bill services/supplies which Medicare does not allow a chiropractor to bill. While integrated medical practices are a great way to promote chiropractic care, this is an example of the entirely wrong way to integrate. Integration should be more about ensuring that patients receive the appropriate care needed instead of a way to simply get around the rules.

According to court documents, “On March 27, 2017, Defendants, in consultation with Company-1, rolled out a bonus program to incentivize the improper billing of HCPCS L8679. Under the bonus program, Defendants paid NP’s, through Company-1, $100 per P-Stim “treatment.” When money is being transferred between businesses this way and bonuses are being offered for non-work, that is a kick-back scheme.

Reimbursement Rates As a Guide

Another red flag is that third-party payers, including Medicare, do not pay far above the value of a service or supply. According to court documents, “While the P-Stim devices typically cost between $300 and $500, Medicare typically reimburses between $5,000 and $6,500 for HCPCS L8679.” In fact, the current Medicare national unadjusted allowed amount for this service is $7,917.79. Does that really sound like a disposable throw away device that costs less than $500 to purchase from the manufacturer? 

Review Manufacturer Information

While HCPCS codes generally cover more than a single device, manufacturers generally know how they should be categorized or coded. It should be noted that in this case, the device manufacturer’s website stated “... [i]t is our understanding that Medicare and some commercial insurance companies are not covering electroacupuncture or auricular vagus nerve stimulation devices…” This should have been another red flag.

Summary

When you file a claim, you are certifying that you understand the rules and that you have followed them. It is your responsibility to know payer policies and follow the rules. Be sure you are conducting regular self-audits. See the ChiroCode DeskBook for a self-audit template.

Court documents identify the p-stim devices as “Stivax, NeuroStim, ANSiStim, E-Pulse, and NSS-2 Bridge.”  If you have billed code L8679 for any of these products, contact a healthcare attorney immediately about how to self-disclose and mitigate penalties for filing false claims.

###

Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us.  Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.


Latest articles:  (any category)

PCS Coding for Ankle Fracture - Look Deeper Into the Codes!
May 25th, 2021 - Christine Woolstenhulme, QCC, QMCS, CPC, CMRS
If you're looking for ankle fractures in ICD-10-PCS, you may need to look a little deeper. Let's take a look at coding an ankle fracture such as a trimalleolar fracture. PCS coding can be confusing as it is nothing like CPT coding; with CPT we can simply code an ankle ...
Intersegmental Traction — What’s Happening with Roller Tables?
May 20th, 2021 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Intersegmental traction therapy via the use of roller tables has been used by doctors of chiropractic for many years. Recently, questions have arisen regarding the appropriate billing of roller tables. This is largely due to the statement published in the July 2020 CPT Assistant published by the American Medical Association (AMA). Which code should you really be using?
Comparison of Add-On Code Guidelines
May 4th, 2021 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Add-on codes are codes that are not intended to be reported alone. They are reported with another primary procedure to identify that additional services have been provided in conjunction with that primary procedure. Generally, they include the words “List separately in addition to code.” Interestingly, there are some differences in the instructions/guidelines regarding the use of these codes in the CPT® codebook, the NCCI Policy Manual, and on the CMS website. This article outlines the differences between each of these.
Coding Lesions and Soft Tissue Excisions
April 29th, 2021 - Christine Woolstenhulme, QCC, QMCS, CPC, CMRS
There are several considerations to be aware of before assigning a code for lesions and soft tissue excisions. The code selection will be determined upon the following: Check the pathology reports, if any, to confirm Morphology (whether the neoplasm is benign, in-situ, malignant, or uncertain) Technique Topography (anatomic location) The size Tissue Level Type of closure required Layers ...
58% of Improper Payments due to Medical Necessity for Ventilators
April 29th, 2021 - Christine Woolstenhulme, QCC, QMCS, CPC, CMRS
Proper documentation not only protects the provider, the payer, and the patient, it protects the integrity of the entire healthcare system. When it comes to coverage and documentation for durable medical, the DMEPOS supplier and staff must be familiar with the National and Local Coverage Determinations (NCDs and LCDs) as these are ...
ICD-11 — What’s Happening?
April 20th, 2021 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
ICD-11 is officially released, but what does that mean for diagnosis coding in the United States? What's really different? This article discusses what has been happening with ICD-11, some interesting things to note about it, as well as links to other important information.
How to Combat COVID-Related Risk Adjustment Losses with the Medicare Annual Wellness Exam
April 12th, 2021 - Aimee Wilcox, CPMA, CCS-P, CST, MA, MT, Director of Content
Identifying new ways to encourage Medicare beneficiaries to schedule and attend their Annual Wellness Exam (AWE) can be difficult, but the Open Enrollment period is a prime time for every payer to identify new beneficiaries and provide a reminder to both new and existing patients that this preventive service does ...



Home About Contact Terms Privacy

innoviHealth® - 62 E 300 North, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 - Phone 801-770-4203 (9-5 Mountain)

Copyright © 2000-2021 innoviHealth Systems®, Inc. - CPT® copyright American Medical Association