Not Following the Rules Costs Chiropractor $5 Million

September 1st, 2020 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Categories:   Chiropractic   Audits/Auditing   Compliance   DME|Supplies|Equipment   HCPCS Coding  
0 Votes - Sign in to vote or comment.

Every healthcare office needs to know and understand the rules that apply to billing services and supplies. According to the false claims lawsuit, code L8679 “Implantable neurostimulator, pulse generator, any type” was billed for a device which was really P-stim, a form of acupuncture. According to court documents, a P-Stim is an electric acupuncture device that is attached to the ears of the patient using two small pads whereas code L8679 describes a product surgically implanted into a patient.

This is not the first time that the OIG has gone after healthcare providers and organizations for inappropriately billing this particular device. In September 2019, another doctor was ordered to pay $178,000 for inappropriately billing for P-stim using the same code (L8679). In fact, the OIG press release stated that “[t]he investigation into others involved in this scheme remains ongoing.” There are several key points that providers need to understand.

A Scheme is a Scheme

Currently, Medicare will only reimburse a chiropractor for chiropractic manipulative treatment. This particular doctor, in order to get around that rule, worked with a consulting company to basically ‘rent’ a medical director and Family Nurse Practitioner from them in order to bill services/supplies which Medicare does not allow a chiropractor to bill. While integrated medical practices are a great way to promote chiropractic care, this is an example of the entirely wrong way to integrate. Integration should be more about ensuring that patients receive the appropriate care needed instead of a way to simply get around the rules.

According to court documents, “On March 27, 2017, Defendants, in consultation with Company-1, rolled out a bonus program to incentivize the improper billing of HCPCS L8679. Under the bonus program, Defendants paid NP’s, through Company-1, $100 per P-Stim “treatment.” When money is being transferred between businesses this way and bonuses are being offered for non-work, that is a kick-back scheme.

Reimbursement Rates As a Guide

Another red flag is that third-party payers, including Medicare, do not pay far above the value of a service or supply. According to court documents, “While the P-Stim devices typically cost between $300 and $500, Medicare typically reimburses between $5,000 and $6,500 for HCPCS L8679.” In fact, the current Medicare national unadjusted allowed amount for this service is $7,917.79. Does that really sound like a disposable throw away device that costs less than $500 to purchase from the manufacturer? 

Review Manufacturer Information

While HCPCS codes generally cover more than a single device, manufacturers generally know how they should be categorized or coded. It should be noted that in this case, the device manufacturer’s website stated “... [i]t is our understanding that Medicare and some commercial insurance companies are not covering electroacupuncture or auricular vagus nerve stimulation devices…” This should have been another red flag.

Summary

When you file a claim, you are certifying that you understand the rules and that you have followed them. It is your responsibility to know payer policies and follow the rules. Be sure you are conducting regular self-audits. See the ChiroCode DeskBook for a self-audit template.

Court documents identify the p-stim devices as “Stivax, NeuroStim, ANSiStim, E-Pulse, and NSS-2 Bridge.”  If you have billed code L8679 for any of these products, contact a healthcare attorney immediately about how to self-disclose and mitigate penalties for filing false claims.

###

Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us.  Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.


Latest articles:  (any category)

How to Combat COVID-Related Risk Adjustment Losses with the Medicare Annual Wellness Exam
April 12th, 2021 - Aimee Wilcox, CPMA, CCS-P, CST, MA, MT, Director of Content
Identifying new ways to encourage Medicare beneficiaries to schedule and attend their Annual Wellness Exam (AWE) can be difficult, but the Open Enrollment period is a prime time for every payer to identify new beneficiaries and provide a reminder to both new and existing patients that this preventive service does ...
Failure to Follow Payer’s Clinical Staff Rules Costs Provider $273K
April 12th, 2021 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Clinical staff (e.g., LPN, RN, MA) provide essential services which allow providers to leverage their time and improve reimbursement opportunities and run their practices more efficiently. There is, however, an ongoing question of how to appropriately bill for clinical staff time. This is really a complex question which comes down to code descriptions, federal or state licensure, AND payer policies. Failure to understand licensing and payer policies led a Connecticut provider organization down a path that ended in a $273,000 settlement with both federal and state governments.
Properly Reporting Imaging Overreads (Including X-Rays)
April 8th, 2021 - Aimee Wilcox CPMA, CCS-P, CST, MA, MT and Wyn Staheli, Director of Content Research
hile many provider groups offer some imaging services in their offices, others may rely on external imaging centers. When the provider reviews images performed by an external source (e.g., independent imaging center), that is typically referred to as an overread or a re-read. Properly reporting that work depends on a variety of factors as discussed in this article.
How Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) Data Enhances Risk Adjustment
March 31st, 2021 - Aimee Wilcox, CPMA, CCS-P, CST, MA, MT, Director of Content
The role of SDOH in overall patient care and outcomes has become a more common topic of discussion among healthcare providers, payers, and policymakers alike. All are attempting to identify and collect SDOH and correlate the data to patient management which is increasingly seen as necessary to address certain health disparities and identify exactly how SDOH affects patient health outcomes. Learn how to address this important subject.
Understanding Skin Biopsy Codes
March 23rd, 2021 - Christine Woolstenhulme, QCC, QMCS, CPC, CMRS
A biopsy is a procedure to obtain only a portion of a lesion for a pathologic exam. According to the AMA, "The use of a biopsy procedure code (e.g., 11102, 11103) indicates that the procedure to obtain tissue for pathologic examination was performed independently, or was unrelated or distinct from other ...
How Reporting E/M Based on Time May Lose Money
March 18th, 2021 - Aimee Wilcox, CPMA, CCS-P, CST, MA, MT, Director of Content
Just like math teachers who require students to show their work so they can see how the student reached their answer, providers are also required to "show their work" through the documentation process in the medical record. By the time a provider has reviewed the patient's subjective complaints (i.e., patient's ...
COVID-19 Vaccines
March 10th, 2021 - Christine Woolstenhulme, QCC, QMCS, CPC, CMRS
To accommodate the new COVID-19 immunizations the CPT editorial panel has approved 11 Category I codes. Watch for new and revised guidelines and parenthetical notes with these codes. For example; which administration codes should be used with the vaccine codes and the NCD codes applicable to the dose being administered. These ...



Home About Contact Terms Privacy

innoviHealth® - 62 E 300 North, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 - Phone 801-770-4203 (9-5 Mountain)

Copyright © 2000-2021 innoviHealth Systems®, Inc. - CPT® copyright American Medical Association