Not Following the Rules Costs Chiropractor $5 Million

September 1st, 2020 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Categories:   Chiropractic   Audits/Auditing   Compliance   DME|Supplies|Equipment   HCPCS Coding  
0 Votes - Sign in to vote or comment.

Every healthcare office needs to know and understand the rules that apply to billing services and supplies. According to the false claims lawsuit, code L8679 “Implantable neurostimulator, pulse generator, any type” was billed for a device which was really P-stim, a form of acupuncture. According to court documents, a P-Stim is an electric acupuncture device that is attached to the ears of the patient using two small pads whereas code L8679 describes a product surgically implanted into a patient.

This is not the first time that the OIG has gone after healthcare providers and organizations for inappropriately billing this particular device. In September 2019, another doctor was ordered to pay $178,000 for inappropriately billing for P-stim using the same code (L8679). In fact, the OIG press release stated that “[t]he investigation into others involved in this scheme remains ongoing.” There are several key points that providers need to understand.

A Scheme is a Scheme

Currently, Medicare will only reimburse a chiropractor for chiropractic manipulative treatment. This particular doctor, in order to get around that rule, worked with a consulting company to basically ‘rent’ a medical director and Family Nurse Practitioner from them in order to bill services/supplies which Medicare does not allow a chiropractor to bill. While integrated medical practices are a great way to promote chiropractic care, this is an example of the entirely wrong way to integrate. Integration should be more about ensuring that patients receive the appropriate care needed instead of a way to simply get around the rules.

According to court documents, “On March 27, 2017, Defendants, in consultation with Company-1, rolled out a bonus program to incentivize the improper billing of HCPCS L8679. Under the bonus program, Defendants paid NP’s, through Company-1, $100 per P-Stim “treatment.” When money is being transferred between businesses this way and bonuses are being offered for non-work, that is a kick-back scheme.

Reimbursement Rates As a Guide

Another red flag is that third-party payers, including Medicare, do not pay far above the value of a service or supply. According to court documents, “While the P-Stim devices typically cost between $300 and $500, Medicare typically reimburses between $5,000 and $6,500 for HCPCS L8679.” In fact, the current Medicare national unadjusted allowed amount for this service is $7,917.79. Does that really sound like a disposable throw away device that costs less than $500 to purchase from the manufacturer? 

Review Manufacturer Information

While HCPCS codes generally cover more than a single device, manufacturers generally know how they should be categorized or coded. It should be noted that in this case, the device manufacturer’s website stated “... [i]t is our understanding that Medicare and some commercial insurance companies are not covering electroacupuncture or auricular vagus nerve stimulation devices…” This should have been another red flag.

Summary

When you file a claim, you are certifying that you understand the rules and that you have followed them. It is your responsibility to know payer policies and follow the rules. Be sure you are conducting regular self-audits. See the ChiroCode DeskBook for a self-audit template.

Court documents identify the p-stim devices as “Stivax, NeuroStim, ANSiStim, E-Pulse, and NSS-2 Bridge.”  If you have billed code L8679 for any of these products, contact a healthcare attorney immediately about how to self-disclose and mitigate penalties for filing false claims.

###

Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us.  Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.


Latest articles:  (any category)

Emergency Department - APC Reimbursement Method
September 15th, 2022 - Christine Woolstenhulme, CPC, CMRS, QCC, QMCS
CMS pays emergency department visits through a payment method using Ambulatory Payment Classifications (APCs). Most payers also use the APC reimbursement system; however, there may be some differences in payer policies (always review your specific payer policy). APCs are the primary type of payment made under the OPPS, comprising groupings ...
Why Medical Coding and Billing Software Desperately Needs AI
September 7th, 2022 - Find-A-Code
It has been said that the healthcare industry is notoriously slow in terms of technology adoption. One need only look at how convoluted medical coding and billing are to know that it needs a technology injection. Specifically, medical coding and billing software desperately needs artificial intelligence (AI).
CMS says Less Paperwork for DME Suppliers after Jan 2023!
August 18th, 2022 - Christine Woolstenhulme, QCC, QMCS, CPC, CMRS
Attention providers, suppliers, billers, and vendors who bill Durable Medical Equipment (DME) to Medicare!  Currently, a supplier receives a signed Certificate of Medical Necessity (CMN) from the treating physician or creates and signs a DME Information Form (DIFs); these are required to be sent with the claim. However, this is about ...
Things to Consider Before Upgrading Medical Billing Software
August 11th, 2022 - Find-A-Code
Your practice has utilized the same medical billing software for years. The medical billing staff says it is time for a change. You don't necessarily disagree, but you also don't know where to begin your search for new software. There are so many vendors offering so many products that making sense of it all can be challenging.
Calendar Year 2023 Medicare Advantage and Part C & D Payment Policies
August 9th, 2022 - Aimee L. Wilcox, CPMA, CCS-P, CST, MA, MT
Each year CMS publishes an Advance Notice of the upcoming years Medicare Advantage (MA) Capitation Rates and Part C and Part D Payment Policies and asks for comments related to it. Each of the comments are carefully reviewed and responded to and often are impactful to changes seen between the Advance Notice and final publication referred to as the Rate Announcement. With health equity as a primary focus for 2023, CMS announced some policy changes that may impact your organization.
How CMS Determines Which Telehealth Services are Risk Adjustable
August 9th, 2022 - Aimee L. Wilcox, CPMA, CCS-P, CST, MA, MT
Medicare Advantage Organizations (MAOs) have gone back and forth on whether or not to use data collected from telehealth, virtual Care, and telephone (audio-only) encounters with Medicare beneficiaries for risk adjustment reporting, but the following published documents from CMS cleared that up once and for all by providing an answer to a question specifically related to this question.
OIG Investigates SCAN Health for Risk Adjustment Overpayments With Surprising Results
July 26th, 2022 - Aimee L. Wilcox, CPMA, CCS-P, CST, MA, MT
We’ve seen a number of OIG risk adjustment data validation (RADV) audits recently where the independent review contractor was simply looking for any codes the payer reported that were not supported by the documentation, in an effort to declare an overpayment was made and monies are due to be repaid. However, it was refreshing to read this RADV audit and discover that the independent review contractor actually identified HCCs the payer failed to report that, while still resulting in an overpayment, was able to reduce the overpayment by giving credit for these additional HCCs. What lessons are you learning from reading these RADV audit reports?



Home About Contact Terms Privacy

innoviHealth® - 62 E 300 North, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 - Phone 801-770-4203 (9-5 Mountain)

Copyright © 2000-2022 innoviHealth Systems®, Inc. - CPT® copyright American Medical Association