CMS Overpaid Providers $729 Million in Incentive Payments

June 16th, 2017 - Chris Woolstenhulme, CPC, CMRS
Categories:   Medicare   Practice Management   MIPS|PQRS|PQRI  
0 Votes - Sign in to vote or comment.

Medicare paid hundreds of millions in electronic health record incentive payments that did not comply with federal requirements according to the OIG.  The OIG estimated CMS inappropriately paid $729,424,395 to EPs who did not meet the requirements for meaningful use.

Eligible professional’s (EP’s) are physicians, dentists, podiatrists, optometrists or chiropractors, if registered to participate in the EHR incentive program may receive incentive payments for up to 5 years.  Although an EP may be eligible to report through self reporting for both Medicare and Medicaid, they may not report and receive incentive payments from both programs, the EP must select only one program.

The office of inspector general reported in June 2017 during the period of May 2011 through June 2014 the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services paid an estimated $729 million in Medicare electronic health record incentive payments to eligible professionals who did not comply with Federal requirements.

In addition, CMS paid $2.3 million in inappropriate electronic health record incentive payments to eligible professionals who switched incentive programs. 12 should not have been awarded incentive payments as they could not provide support for the attested measures. The OIG stated, “Of the 100 EPs in the sample, 12 could not provide support for the measures to which they attested: six EPs could not provide a security risk assessment; four EPs could not provide support that they had generated at least one report listing patients with a specific condition, and three EPs; could not provide required documentation in the form of patient encounter data for the measures to which they self-attested”. This resulted in $253,622 in inappropriate incentive payments, according to OIG.

The OIG reveled due to the fact that the sampled EP’s did not maintain support for their attestations; it “left the EHR program vulnerable to abuse and misuse of Federal funds.” The findings in the OIG review identified 14 EP’s out of 100 that did not meet meaningful use requirements due to insufficient attestation support, inappropriate reported periods, or did not use certified EHR technology. The overpayment on just these 14 EPs totaled $291,222. 

The Office of inspector General recommended CMS recover the $729,424,395 in estimated inappropriate incentive payments and educate EP’s on proper documentation requirements.  It was also recommended CMS employ edits to ensure that an EP does not receive payments under both CMS and Medicaid programs in the same year.

The OIG also recommended with MACRA, any modifications with meaningful use requirements include stronger program integrity safeguards to ensure a more consistent verification to ensure EPs are using and reporting EHR technology consistent with CMS’s goal of Advancing Care Information under MIPS. 

###

Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us.  Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.


Latest articles:  (any category)

​​Polysomnography Services Under OIG Scrutiny
September 2nd, 2021 - Raquel Shumway
The OIG conducted a study dated June 2019 wherein they indicated that there were approximately $269 million in overpayments for polysomnography services for the period of 2014 through 2015. According to the OIG “These errors occurred because the CMS oversight of polysomnography services was insufficient to ensure that providers complied with Medicare requirements and to prevent payment of claims that didn’t meet those requirements.” So what are those requirements?
Medicare Advantage - The Fastest Growing Government-Funded Program Undergoing Multiple Fraud Investigations
August 16th, 2021 - Aimee Wilcox, CPMA, CCS-P, CST, MA, MT, Director of Content
Medicare Advantage is the fastest growing form of government-funded healthcare and the rate of fraud within this segment has come under increased scrutiny. Funding is determined by the health status of each beneficiary; therefore, accurate coding based on detailed documentation makes the medical record vital to the process because some ...
Billing Dental Implants under Medical Coverage
August 12th, 2021 - Christine Woolstenhulme, QCC, QMCS, CPC, CMRS
Implants can be costly to the patient and the provider, and it is crucial to understand how to bill a patient’s medical insurance to ensure there is adequate coverage for the best treatment. Implants are commonly billed in a dental office under a patient’s medical benefits.    Implants could be considered ...
New Codes for COVID Booster Vaccine & Monoclonal Antibody Products
August 10th, 2021 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
New codes have been announced for the COVID-19 booster vaccine, Novavax vaccine, and monoclonal antibody treatment.
Medicare's ABN Booklet Revised
July 29th, 2021 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
The “Medicare Advance Written Notices of Non-coverage” booklet, published by CMS’s Medicare Learning Network, was updated. This article discusses the changes to this booklet regarding the use of the ABN.
Chronic Pain Coding Today & in the Future
July 19th, 2021 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Properly documenting and coding chronic pain can be challenging. As is commonly the case with many conditions, over the years, there has been a shift in the identification of different types of pain, including chronic pain. Understanding where we are now and where we are going will help your organization prepare for the future by changing documentation patterns now.
How Does Global and Professional Direct Contracting (GPDC) Affect Risk Adjustment?
July 15th, 2021 - Aimee Wilcox, CPMA, CCS-P, CST, MA, MT, Director of Content
CMS recently announced the 53 Direct Contracting Entities (DCEs) that will be participating in the April 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021 Global and Professional Direct Contracting (GPDC) Model. Among those participating is Clover Health Partners, who runs an in-home primary care program that has the potential to help Medicare ...



Home About Contact Terms Privacy

innoviHealth® - 62 E 300 North, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 - Phone 801-770-4203 (9-5 Mountain)

Copyright © 2000-2021 innoviHealth Systems®, Inc. - CPT® copyright American Medical Association