Review of Systems
January 30th, 2015 - Codapedia Editor
Sometimes one symptom can be used in more than one system. For example, dizziness. Although we typically think of this as a neurological symptom, sometimes cardiologists ask about dizziness and relate it to the cardiovascular system.
In the citations section of this entry, there are references for symptoms that go with each system in the review of systems.
Can you use an item, which you have counted in your history of the present illness in your review of system as well? That is, can you double-dip? There is nothing in the Documentation Guidelines themselves which prevents you from double-dipping. That is, if a patient describes in detail their GI complaint and it is documented as a history of the present illness, you may count that as a GI ROS in that section of the notes. Some consultants and auditors don't allow this. There is no CMS guideline that prohibits it.
A staff member may complete the review of systems or the patient may complete this ROS on a form, and it can count towards the level of service for the note, as long as there is evidence that the billing clinician has reviewed this information. This might be shown by the billing clinician reviewing the form, making comments, and signing and dating the form. Or, the clinician should add to the documentation “the remainder of the review of system is on the history and was reviewed with the patient by me.”
Can we use the words “all others negative” in the review of systems? The guidelines are specific about this. After the billing clinician has documented all the positives in the history of the present illness and any pertinent negatives relating to the patient's presenting problem or condition, then the clinician, after reviewing all of the systems, may say, "Except as above, all others were reviewed and are negative." Let's examine that statement more carefully. First, all the positives must be documented. Second, all of the negative systems specifically related to the patient's presenting problem or condition must be specifically noted to be negative. The billing clinician must review all of the systems in the review of systems. Then, it is permissible for the billing clinician to say, “Except as above, all others were negative,” and this will count as a complete review of systems.
What about the words noncontributory or unremarkable? The guidelines do not specifically mention these words. Most auditors do not count them as a complete review of systems. Some carriers have specifically stated that they are not countable for a complete review of systems. Stick with negative!
###
Questions, comments?
If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us. Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.
Latest articles: (any category)
COVID Vaccine Coding Changes as of November 1, 2023October 26th, 2023 - Wyn StaheliCOVID vaccine changes due to the end of the PHE as of November 1, 2023 are addressed in this article.
Medicare Guidance Changes for E/M ServicesOctober 11th, 2023 - Wyn Staheli2023 brought quite a few changes to Evaluation and management (E/M) services. The significant revisions as noted in the CPT codebook were welcome changes to bring other E/M services more in line with the changes that took place with Office or Other Outpatient Services a few years ago. As part of CMS’ Medicare Learning Network, the “Evaluation and Management Services Guide” publication was finally updated as of August 2023 to include the changes that took place in 2023. If you take a look at the new publication (see references below),....
Can We Score Interpretation of an EKG Towards E/M Medical Decision Making?October 10th, 2023 - Aimee WilcoxWhen EKGs are performed in the facility setting or even in the physician's office, what are the requirements for reporting the service and who gets credit for scoring data points for Evaluation and Management (E/M) medical decision making (MDM)? Let's take a look at a few coding scenarios related to EKG services to get a better understanding of why this can be problematic.
Accurately Reporting Signs and Symptoms with ICD-10-CM CodesOctober 5th, 2023 - Aimee WilcoxCoders often find themselves unsure of when to report a sign or symptom code documented in the medical record. Some coders find their organization has an EHR that requires a working diagnosis, which is usually a sign or symptom, be entered to order a test or diagnostic study or image. Understanding the guidelines surrounding when signs and symptoms should be reported is the first step in correct coding so let's take a look at some scenarios.
The 2024 ICD-10-CM Updates Include New Codes for Reporting Metabolic Disorders and Insulin ResistanceSeptember 19th, 2023 - Aimee WilcoxDiabetes is a chronic disease that just seems to consistently be increasing instead of improving resulting in a constant endeavor by medical researchers to identify causal effects and possible treatments. One underlying or precipitating condition that scientists have identified as a precipitating factor in the development of diabetes is insulin resistance, which is a known metabolic disorder. As data becomes available through claims reporting, additional code options become possible with ICD-10-CM.
Documenting and Reporting Postoperative VisitsSeptember 12th, 2023 - Aimee WilcoxSometimes we receive questions regarding documentation requirements for specific codes or coding requirements and we respond with information and resources to support our answers. The following question was recently submitted: Are providers required to report postoperative services on claims using 99024, especially if there is no payment for that service? What documentation is required if you are reporting an unrelated Evaluation and Management (E/M) service by the same physician during the postoperative period?
Understanding Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and ICD-10-CM CodingAugust 22nd, 2023 - Aimee WilcoxGastroesophageal reflux disease or GERD for short, is a disease that impacts millions of Americans on a weekly basis. Symptoms are uncomfortable, as are some of the tests used to diagnose it, but understanding the disease, tests, and treatments helps us better understand how to code the disease using ICD-10-CM codes.
