Review of Systems

January 30th, 2015 - Codapedia Editor
Categories:   Audits/Auditing   Coding   Documentation Guidelines  
0 Votes - Sign in to vote or comment.

Sometimes one symptom can be used in more than one system.  For example, dizziness. Although we typically think of this as a neurological symptom, sometimes cardiologists ask about dizziness and relate it to the cardiovascular system. 

In the citations section of this entry, there are references for symptoms that go with each system in the review of systems. 

Can you use an item, which you have counted in your history of the present illness in your review of system as well?  That is, can you double-dip?  There is nothing in the Documentation Guidelines themselves which prevents you from double-dipping.  That is, if a patient describes in detail their GI complaint and it is documented as a history of the present illness, you may count that as a GI ROS in that section of the notes.  Some consultants and auditors don't allow this.  There is no CMS guideline that prohibits it. 

A staff member may complete the review of systems or the patient may complete this ROS on a form, and it can count towards the level of service for the note, as long as there is evidence that the billing clinician has reviewed this information.  This might be shown by the billing clinician reviewing the form, making comments, and signing and dating the form.  Or, the clinician should add to the documentation “the remainder of the review of system is on the history and was reviewed with the patient by me.”

Can we use the words “all others negative” in the review of systems?  The guidelines are specific about this.  After the billing clinician has documented all the positives in the history of the present illness and any pertinent negatives relating to the patient's presenting problem or condition, then the clinician, after reviewing all of the systems, may say, "Except as above, all others were reviewed and are negative."  Let's examine that statement more carefully.  First, all the positives must be documented.  Second, all of the negative systems specifically related to the patient's presenting problem or condition must be specifically noted to be negative.  The billing clinician must review all of the systems in the review of systems.  Then, it is permissible for the billing clinician to say, “Except as above, all others were negative,” and this will count as a complete review of systems. 

What about the words noncontributory or unremarkable?  The guidelines do not specifically mention these words.  Most auditors do not count them as a complete review of systems.  Some carriers have specifically stated that they are not countable for a complete review of systems.  Stick with negative!

###

Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us.  Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.


Latest articles:  (any category)

How to Search Find-A-Code for Medicare Policies and Guidelines — LCDs, NCDs and Articles —
November 18th, 2020 - Raquel Shumway
Help for Searching Find-A-Code when searching for Medicare Policies and Guidelines — LCDs, NCDs and/or Articles.
Cross-A-Code Instructions in Find-A-Code
November 18th, 2020 - Raquel Shumway
Cross-A-Codeis a toll found in Find-A-Code which helps you to locate codes in other code sets that help you when submitting a claim.
COVID Vaccine Codes Announced
November 11th, 2020 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
On November 10, 2020, the American Medical Association (AMA) announced the addition of two new codes which will be used for the new COVID-19 vaccines along with 4 new administration codes to be used when reporting the administration of these vaccines.
Are You Aware of the 2021 Star Rating System Updates?
November 5th, 2020 - Aimee Wilcox, CPMA, CCS-P, CST, MA, MT, Director of Content
Each year the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) publishes the Star Ratings System Updates for Medicare Advantage (Part C) and Medicare Prescription (Part D). This rating system was developed to help beneficiaries identify and select the health plans that best meet their needs, specifically addressing main issues:  Quality of ...
Special Needs Plans Help Beneficiaries and Risk Adjustment Reporting
October 22nd, 2020 - Aimee Wilcox, CPMA, CCS-P, CST, MA, MT, Director of Content
It is no secret that Medicare and Medicaid are steadily moving towards their goal of value-based health care. Medicare Part C (Medicare Advantage) identifies and rewards payers, and subsequently their providers, for increasing the efficiency and quality of care they provide to Medicare...
CMS Expands Telehealth Again
October 20th, 2020 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
On October 14, 2020, CMS announced further changes to expand telehealth coverage. Eleven (11) new codes have been added to their list of covered services bringing the current total to 144 services. The new services include some neurostimulator analysis and programming services as well as some cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation services.
Significant COVID-19 Code Changes as of October 6
October 8th, 2020 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Significan COVID-19 Code Changes as of October 6



Home About Contact Terms Privacy

innoviHealth® - 62 E 300 North, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 - Phone 801-770-4203 (9-5 Mountain)

Copyright © 2000-2020 innoviHealth Systems®, Inc. - CPT® copyright American Medical Association