History of the present illness

January 30th, 2015 - Codapedia Editor
Categories:   Audits/Auditing   Coding   Primary Care|Family Care  

Here are the elements of the HPI:

Location: Where do the patient's symptoms occur?  In order to use location, it should be a place on the body that you could point to or touch and that the physician describes as the place where the patient's symptoms occur.  Head, shoulders, knees and toes.

Quality:  What is the nature of the patient's symptoms? What is it like?  What characteristics describe the symptom?  Typically this will include colors, such as green, red, or yellowish.  It will include a description of the type of pain: burning, stabbing, dull, achy, etc.

Severity:  That is, how bad are the patient's symptoms?  Are they getting better or worse, increasing or decreasing?  Sometimes a clinician might note the pain scale that the patient is having, such as 9 of 10.  The patient might be feeling well or okay.

Duration: How long has the patient has these symptoms?  It could be short.  That is, the patient had them in the middle of last night, the symptoms have lasted for 24 hours, or it could be a longer time, such as longstanding, months, years.  Any description about the duration of the length of the patient's symptoms, illness or condition can be used as an element of duration.

Timing:  That is, under what circumstances do the symptom occur?  Is it intermittent, continuous, constant, upon awakening, still, or after exercising?  Those are the kinds of words, which can be used to describe the timing of a symptom.

Context:  In order to answer this question, consider in what context the patient's symptoms occur.  Did they happen after a motor vehicle accident, after slipping on the ice, or in relation to another illness or surgery?  

Modifying factors:  The modifying factors are any treatments prescribed by a physician or tried by the patient without physician direction, which the patient has used to try and improve their symptoms.  It could be that the patient has been on antibiotics already for a week, or that the patient has tried elevating their leg without relief, or that they have tried over-the-counter medications.  Aspirin, rest, antibiotics, CABG.

Associated signs and symptoms. That is, other findings that the patient presents with, related or unrelated to today's chief complaint.  It could be that the patient came in and also complained of fever, weakness, confusion--any other symptom, which the patient describes.  We typically think of these elements as positive complaints, but many auditors will use a negative response in associated signs and symptoms.

Can you use the same element twice?  The guidelines do not say yes or no about this. Some coding auditors report that in private communication CMS has told them that they can use the same element twice.  That is, they could use hip and leg, or hip and arm, as two elements if they were two different problems described in the HPI.  This is not verified in writing and it would be more conservative not to do that.  

Only the billing clinician may document the history of the present illness.  Unlike the chief complaint, review of systems, and past family medical and social history where a staff member might document part of the history as long as the physician has reviewed it, the history of the present illness must be documented by the billing provider.  

It is possible to use the status of three chronic diseases in place of the four elements of the history of the present illness.  This is especially helpful when treating patients with chronic problems such as diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. In this case, specifically document the status of their problems at home in the history section.  Here is an example: “I am seeing this patient for follow-up for diabetes.  She reports her blood sugars at home to be in 150-200 range.  She is checking her sugars after meals.  Her current medication are X,Y and Z.”  Document the status of at least three of their chronic diseases in place of the four HPI elements.  Document one or the other.

It is insufficient to simply list their chronic diseases in the history and document the status in the assessment in the plan.  The status of their chronic diseases must be documented in the HPI.  

###

Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us.  Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.


Latest articles:  (any category)

Finding Patterns of Complexity in the Medical Decision Making (MDM) Table
August 8th, 2023 - Aimee Wilcox
Changes to the Medical Decision Making (MDM) Table in 2023 reflect the work performed in the facility setting in addition to the work involved in Evaluation and Management (E/M) scoring in other places of service. Taking the time to really look closely at the MDM Table and identify patterns in wording and scoring helps coders to understand scoring in an easier way.
Seven Reasons to Standardize Medical Records
July 18th, 2023 - Aimee Wilcox
The standardization of medical records offers numerous benefits for healthcare systems, providers, and patients. By ensuring interoperability, improved workflows, better patient safety, supporting research endeavors, and optimizing resource allocation, standardized records contribute to improved efficiency, quality of care and especially patient outcomes. Here are seven reasons to standardize medical records.
Advancements in Coding Hospital Observation Care Services in 2023
July 4th, 2023 - Aimee Wilcox
Hospitals are increasingly adopting innovative solutions to improve patient care and optimize processes and many of these solutions follow immediately the recent CPT and Medicare coding changes.  In 2023 coding of hospital observation care services underwent significant changes enabling healthcare providers to accurately document and bill for the sick or injured patient that requires a higher level of medical services between the emergency room care and hospital admission. This article explores the key changes in coding hospital observation care services and their impact on healthcare delivery.
Be Aware — Emergency Department Visits Under OIG Scrutiny
June 20th, 2023 - Wyn Staheli
Every year the Department of Health & Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) creates an official work plan giving everyone a heads up as to what they are going to be reviewing. The 2022 Work Plan stated that they would be reviewing claims for Evaluation & Management services provided in an emergency department (ED) setting.
OIG Audit Reveals Diagnosis Reporting Problems Affecting Risk Adjustment Scoring
June 15th, 2023 - Wyn Staheli
The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) recently published their Spring 2023 Semiannual Report to Congress. This report contained some diagnoses reporting issues that all providers need to be aware of. They focused on several groups of diagnoses that they considered “High-Risk” for being miscoded. Several states were included in the report and the types of errors for all can be generally grouped into several categories.
Documenting for Suture and Staple Removal E/M Add-On Codes
May 30th, 2023 - Aimee Wilcox
Historically, the 10-day and 90-day global periods would include the patient's follow-up Evaluation and Management (E/M) services and any dressing changes or staple/suture removal related to the surgery; however, following a closer analysis of these and other surgery codes, the decision was made to make significant revisions to these codes to ensure proper reporting.
Are you Properly Reporting Radiology Services?
May 23rd, 2023 - Wyn Staheli
It’s probably not surprising that the most commonly billed imaging services are radiologic examinations of the humerus, spine, fingers, and abdomen (codes 72070, 73140, 73060, 74019). However, there are currently 653 CPT codes in the main imaging section (70000-79999). Therefore, it’s worth it to take a few moments to review some important information about these services to ensure that proper coding (including the correct use of modifiers) takes place. This can help your organization ensure correct coding and reimbursement and thus minimize the chances for claim denials and payer take-backs (post-payment denials).



Home About Terms Privacy

innoviHealth® - 62 E 300 North, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 - Phone 801-770-4203 (9-5 Mountain)

Copyright © 2000-2023 innoviHealth Systems®, Inc. - CPT® copyright American Medical Association