Don’t expect beneficiaries to pick up the slack for PQRS, EHR cuts

December 4th, 2014 - Scott Kraft
Categories:   Electronic Medical Records (EMR/EHR)   Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFSDB)   MIPS|PQRS|PQRI   Reimbursement  
0 Votes - Sign in to vote or comment.

2015 is a big year for payment adjustments for providers who’ve failed to take part in CMS incentive programs for electronic health records (EHR) meaningful use, e-prescribing and the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS).

   It’s the year that CMS goes from dangling the carrot of extra pay to using the stick of less pay for providers who’ve failed to take part in these programs, or to obtain a hardship exemption of any sort.
   
   The HITECH Act decreed that, starting in 2015, those who didn’t report enough quality measures in PQRS would see a 1.5 percent cut, those who failed to achieve EHR meaningful use would see a 1 percent cut.
  
   For providers who accept assignment on Medicare claims, CMS will take the penalty directly out of the allowed amount for services billed. Because it will apply the penalty to the entire allowed charge, then pay 80 percent of that amount, the beneficiary’s 20 percent coinsurance would be slightly reduced as well.
  
   Non-participating providers who don’t accept assignment can typically charge up to 115 percent of the allowed charge for a service. The difference is, the beneficiary pays directly to the provider and Medicare makes its payment directly to the beneficiary.
  
   Even in these instances, however, the ultimate payment the provider is able to collect will be reduced for failure to take part in incentive programs.
  
   In recent transmittal 1384 to its One Time Notification Manual, CMS spells out how it will work, using a hypothetical service with a $100 allowed charge.
  
   Ordinarily, a non-par provider who accepted assignment would get paid 95 percent of the allowed charge, or $95, with the beneficiary paying 20 percent of that amount.
  
   The calculation formula is the same for a provider who doesn’t accept assignment, but it impacts how much the provider is allowed to charge the beneficiary. In the case of the 1 percent cut for failing to do PQRS, the result would be that the Medicare allowed charge for the $100 service would be cut to $94.05 instead of $95.
  
   When the provider charges the patient the full limiting charge, the total would be 115% of $94.05, which is $108.16, instead of the previous $109.25.
  
   A non-par provider who is being penalized for both PQRS and EHR would see the allowable for the $100 shaved down to $92.64, with the limiting charge dipping down to $106.54 instead of $109.25.
  
   CMS will maintain fee schedules with the correct amounts for providers who face either or both payment adjustment in 2015. Providers are also reminded that the penalty for charging a patient an amount in excess of the limiting charge can be as high as $10,000 per violation.
  
   One thing is for certain – the continued use of payment adjustments will make correct payment calculation a bit more complicated next year.
 

###

Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us.  Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.


Latest articles:  (any category)

Important Podcast on Dental to Medical Billing
September 21st, 2020 - Christine Woolstenhulme, QCC, QMCS, CPC, CMRS
Be sure and check out this discussion with LaMont Leavitt (CEO of innoviHealth) and Christine Taxin (Adjunct professor at New York University, President of Dental Medical Billing, and Links2Success).  Some of the resources and tools they discuss will help you with your dental coding/billing and education. Do You Have All the Right ...
More COVID-19 Codes Added as of September 8, 2020
September 15th, 2020 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
The American Medical Association (AMA) recently announced the addition of two more CPT codes in relation to COVID and the Public Health Emergency (PHE). Codes 99702 and 86413 were posted to the AMA website on Tuesday, September 8, 2020 and new guidelines have been added as well.
Not Following the Rules Costs Chiropractor $5 Million
September 1st, 2020 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Every healthcare office needs to know and understand the rules that apply to billing services and supplies. What lessons can we learn from the mistakes of others? What if we have made the same mistake?
New Value-Based Payment Models for Primary Care (Primary Care First and Direct Contracting)
August 28th, 2020 - Jared Staheli
This article summarizes the new Medicare value-based payment models: Primary Care First and Direct Contracting.
Podcast - Do you have all the right Dental resources needed to succeed in Dental Medical Billing and Coding?
August 27th, 2020 - Innoventrum
Discussion between innoviHealth CEO, LaMont Leavitt and Guest speaker, Christine Taxin who is an Adjunct professor at New York University, and President of Dental Medical Billing and Links2Success about making sure you have all the right Dental resources needed to succeed in Dental Medical Billing and Coding. ...
Is COVID-19 Causing Risk Adjustment “Gotcha’s”?
August 27th, 2020 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
The COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) has created some possible problems when it comes to risk adjustment. Be sure your organization has implemented policies and procedures to try and overcome these new hurdles.
New and Exciting Changes in the Dental Industry
August 26th, 2020 - Christine Taxin - Links 2 Success
My colleagues and I are nerds for information on all things billable—or not billable—in the worlds of dental and medical insurance. One of the most puzzling challenges for me over the past 15 years of teaching has been to understand why we on the dental side are segregated out of ...



Home About Contact Terms Privacy

innoviHealth® - 62 E 300 North, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 - Phone 801-770-4203 (9-5 Mountain)

Copyright © 2000-2020 innoviHealth Systems®, Inc. - CPT® copyright American Medical Association