Don’t expect beneficiaries to pick up the slack for PQRS, EHR cuts

December 4th, 2014 - Scott Kraft
Categories:   Electronic Medical Records (EMR/EHR)   Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFSDB)   MIPS|PQRS|PQRI   Reimbursement  
0 Votes - Sign in to vote or comment.

2015 is a big year for payment adjustments for providers who’ve failed to take part in CMS incentive programs for electronic health records (EHR) meaningful use, e-prescribing and the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS).

   It’s the year that CMS goes from dangling the carrot of extra pay to using the stick of less pay for providers who’ve failed to take part in these programs, or to obtain a hardship exemption of any sort.
   
   The HITECH Act decreed that, starting in 2015, those who didn’t report enough quality measures in PQRS would see a 1.5 percent cut, those who failed to achieve EHR meaningful use would see a 1 percent cut.
  
   For providers who accept assignment on Medicare claims, CMS will take the penalty directly out of the allowed amount for services billed. Because it will apply the penalty to the entire allowed charge, then pay 80 percent of that amount, the beneficiary’s 20 percent coinsurance would be slightly reduced as well.
  
   Non-participating providers who don’t accept assignment can typically charge up to 115 percent of the allowed charge for a service. The difference is, the beneficiary pays directly to the provider and Medicare makes its payment directly to the beneficiary.
  
   Even in these instances, however, the ultimate payment the provider is able to collect will be reduced for failure to take part in incentive programs.
  
   In recent transmittal 1384 to its One Time Notification Manual, CMS spells out how it will work, using a hypothetical service with a $100 allowed charge.
  
   Ordinarily, a non-par provider who accepted assignment would get paid 95 percent of the allowed charge, or $95, with the beneficiary paying 20 percent of that amount.
  
   The calculation formula is the same for a provider who doesn’t accept assignment, but it impacts how much the provider is allowed to charge the beneficiary. In the case of the 1 percent cut for failing to do PQRS, the result would be that the Medicare allowed charge for the $100 service would be cut to $94.05 instead of $95.
  
   When the provider charges the patient the full limiting charge, the total would be 115% of $94.05, which is $108.16, instead of the previous $109.25.
  
   A non-par provider who is being penalized for both PQRS and EHR would see the allowable for the $100 shaved down to $92.64, with the limiting charge dipping down to $106.54 instead of $109.25.
  
   CMS will maintain fee schedules with the correct amounts for providers who face either or both payment adjustment in 2015. Providers are also reminded that the penalty for charging a patient an amount in excess of the limiting charge can be as high as $10,000 per violation.
  
   One thing is for certain – the continued use of payment adjustments will make correct payment calculation a bit more complicated next year.
 

###

Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us.  Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.


Latest articles:  (any category)

​​Polysomnography Services Under OIG Scrutiny
September 2nd, 2021 - Raquel Shumway
The OIG conducted a study dated June 2019 wherein they indicated that there were approximately $269 million in overpayments for polysomnography services for the period of 2014 through 2015. According to the OIG “These errors occurred because the CMS oversight of polysomnography services was insufficient to ensure that providers complied with Medicare requirements and to prevent payment of claims that didn’t meet those requirements.” So what are those requirements?
Medicare Advantage - The Fastest Growing Government-Funded Program Undergoing Multiple Fraud Investigations
August 16th, 2021 - Aimee Wilcox, CPMA, CCS-P, CST, MA, MT, Director of Content
Medicare Advantage is the fastest growing form of government-funded healthcare and the rate of fraud within this segment has come under increased scrutiny. Funding is determined by the health status of each beneficiary; therefore, accurate coding based on detailed documentation makes the medical record vital to the process because some ...
Billing Dental Implants under Medical Coverage
August 12th, 2021 - Christine Woolstenhulme, QCC, QMCS, CPC, CMRS
Implants can be costly to the patient and the provider, and it is crucial to understand how to bill a patient’s medical insurance to ensure there is adequate coverage for the best treatment. Implants are commonly billed in a dental office under a patient’s medical benefits.    Implants could be considered ...
New Codes for COVID Booster Vaccine & Monoclonal Antibody Products
August 10th, 2021 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
New codes have been announced for the COVID-19 booster vaccine, Novavax vaccine, and monoclonal antibody treatment.
Medicare's ABN Booklet Revised
July 29th, 2021 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
The “Medicare Advance Written Notices of Non-coverage” booklet, published by CMS’s Medicare Learning Network, was updated. This article discusses the changes to this booklet regarding the use of the ABN.
Chronic Pain Coding Today & in the Future
July 19th, 2021 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Properly documenting and coding chronic pain can be challenging. As is commonly the case with many conditions, over the years, there has been a shift in the identification of different types of pain, including chronic pain. Understanding where we are now and where we are going will help your organization prepare for the future by changing documentation patterns now.
How Does Global and Professional Direct Contracting (GPDC) Affect Risk Adjustment?
July 15th, 2021 - Aimee Wilcox, CPMA, CCS-P, CST, MA, MT, Director of Content
CMS recently announced the 53 Direct Contracting Entities (DCEs) that will be participating in the April 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021 Global and Professional Direct Contracting (GPDC) Model. Among those participating is Clover Health Partners, who runs an in-home primary care program that has the potential to help Medicare ...



Home About Contact Terms Privacy

innoviHealth® - 62 E 300 North, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 - Phone 801-770-4203 (9-5 Mountain)

Copyright © 2000-2021 innoviHealth Systems®, Inc. - CPT® copyright American Medical Association