Look for standard use of remittance advice codes in 2014

September 6th, 2013 - Scott Kraft   
Categories:   Billing   Denials & Denial Management  
0 Votes - Sign in to vote or comment.

Confusion over how to respond to electronic remittance advice (ERA) will hopefully decline in 2014, thanks to efforts from the Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare (CAQH) to streamline and standardize how payers use ERA codes to convey why your claims are being denied or rejected.

These standardization efforts were driven by the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Remittance codes will be divided into these four categories:
1. Additional Information Required – Missing/Invalid/Incomplete Documentation
2. Additional Information Required – Missing/Invalid/Incomplete Data from Submitted Claim
3. Billed Service Not Covered by Health Plan
4. Benefit for Billed Services Not Payable

The efforts at standardization are designed to head off confusion from how different payers are deciding to use electronic remittance advice on claims. The benefit to physician practices is the ability to better understand how to quickly determine the best response to claims denials and rejections.

Underneath the four core reasons why claims aren’t being paid, the CAQH standardization breaks down the remittance advice codes in a standardized way. The changes will be implemented by CMS by Jan. 6, 2014.

For an example of how it works, let’s look at the first scenario from above, Additional Information Required – Missing/Incomplete/Invalid Documentation.

In the first scenario, you’ll see an initial code, in this case Claim Adjustment Reason Code 16: Claim/service lacks information which is needed for adjudication. At least one Remark Code must be provided (may be comprised of either the NCPDP Reject Reason Code, or Remittance Advice Remark Code that is not an ALERT).

The presence of that code limits the remittance advice remark codes (RARCs) that should accompany the claims denial because you are now focused on only denials or claims rejections caused by missing information.

Two examples of RARCs you might see are M47 (Missing/incomplete/invalid internal or document control number, or M51 (Missing/incomplete/invalid procedure). But you wouldn’t see either of those two codes without seeing an initial denial or rejection claim type to help frame your response.

The denial code infrastructure being established by CAQH is a HIPAA standard code set, which should make it easier to determine how to more quickly and effectively address denials in 2014.


Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us.  Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.

Latest articles:  (any category)

CMS and HHS Tighten Enrollment Rules and Increase Penalties
October 1st, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
This ruling impacts what providers and suppliers are required to disclose to be considered eligible to participate in Medicare, Medicaid, and Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP). The original proposed rule came out in 2016 and this final rule will go into effect on November 4, 2019. There have been known problems ...
Federal Workers Compensation Information
October 1st, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
When federal employees sustain work-related injuries, it does not go through state workers compensation insurance. You must be an enrolled provider to provide services or supplies. The following are some recommended links for additional information about this program. Division of Federal Employees' Compensation (DFEC) website Division of Federal Employees' Compensation (DFEC) provider ...
E-Health is a Big Deal in 2020
September 16th, 2019 - Chris Woolstenhulme, QCC, CMCS, CPC, CMRS
The new 2020 CPT codes are on the way! We are going to see 248 new codes, 71 deletions, and 75 revisions. Health monitoring and e-visits are getting attention; 6 new codes play a vital part in patients taking a part in their care from their own home. New patient-initiated ...
Chiropractic 2020 Codes Changes Are Here
September 9th, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
There are some interesting coding changes which chiropractic offices will want to know about. Are codes that you are billing changing?
Q/A: Is the Functional Rating Index by Evidence-Based Chiropractic Valid?
September 9th, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Question Is the Functional Rating Index, from the Institute of Evidence-Based Chiropractic, valid and acceptable? Or do we have to use Oswestry and NDI? Answer You can use any outcome assessment questionnaire that has been normalized and vetted for the target population and can be scored so you can compare the results from ...
List of Cranial Nerves
September 3rd, 2019 - Find-A-Code
Cranial nerves are involved with some of our senses such as vision, hearing and taste, others control certain muscles in the head and neck. There are twelve pairs of cranial nerves that lead from the brain to the head, neck and trunk. Below is a list of Cranial Nerves and ...
So How Do I Get Paid for This? APC, OPPS, IPPS, DRG?
August 21st, 2019 - Chris Woolstenhulme, QCC, CMCS, CPC, CMRS
You know how to find a procedure code and you may even know how to do the procedure, but where does the reimbursement come from?  It seems to be a mystery to many of us, so let's clear up some common confusion and review some of the main reimbursement systems.  One of the ...

About Codapedia by InnoviHealth Systems Contact Us Terms of Use Privacy Policy Advertise with Us

Codapedia™ by InnoviHealth Systems™ - 62 E 300 North, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 - Phone 801-770-4203 (9-5 Mountain) - Fax (801) 770-4428

Copyright © 2009-2019 Find A Code, LLC - CPT® copyright American Medical Association