How to bill for Well Woman Exams (WWE)

April 15th, 2009 - Charlene Burgett
Categories:   Billing   Coding   Preventive Medicine Service  
0 Votes - Sign in to vote or comment.

Well Woman Exam Coding

There are options for billing pelvic exams and Pap smears for non-Medicare payers, albeit inconsistently by health plan. Some health plans will pay G0101, Q0091, S0610 and/or S0612. Some will pay one or another, some will pay a combination of two, others will pay certain ones with a preventive visit (9938x-9939x series) and others will not. Some will only pay the HCPCS codes above with an Office Visit (9920x-9921x series) and others will not. Usually health plans are not forthright in communicating their reimbursement patterns and the provider will need to do their own research and billing trials based on health plan.

Billing the Q0091 and/or the G0101 with a Preventive Medicine code is somewhat controversial. You will find some people who are adamantly against it. I personally feel that because the Preventive Medicine codes are only differentiated by New and Established patient and by Age; therefore gender specific further evaluation should be reimbursed on top of the Preventive Medicine visit. So, basically, a female preventive medicine exam reimburses the same exact amount as a male of the same age. However, a well-woman exam is more labor intensive, greater risk and utilizes more supplies and time than what would be included in a well-man exam. Why shouldn't we receive a higher reimbursement to cover the costs of a breast and pelvic exam and obtaining pap smear? We may not have to pay for the thin-prep containers, but we do have to pay for the speculum, spatulas, brush, gloves, lubricant, gown, etc.

In addition, many women choose to see their PCP for the general physical exam and go to their gynecologist for the well-woman part of it. Should the gynecologist use the Preventive Medicine code for their portion of the exam....even though they don't go beyond the genitourinary system? The gynecologist should be able to code the G0101 and the Q0091 (and possibly an OV code if there is a problem-oriented issue discussed), leaving the Preventive Medicine code to the PCP. Now, what happens if the health plan will never pay the Q0091 and G0101? The gynecologist will not get paid!

I typically suggest that the Q0091 and G0101 code be coded to every health plan and not to worry which ones pay and which ones don't. It's better to code it and get paid for one or both than to not code and not get paid on either. For example, for one major healthplan, I recommend that our physicians perform and code a Preventive Medicine code first. During that visit, the physician should perform the basic preventive medicine exam and order the blood work and any other testing that is necessary for age and gender. Have the patient return to the office on another day and go over the results of the testing that has already been done, address any problem issues, and then do a well-woman exam...code the OV(with modifier -25) and the G0101 and Q0091 codes for that second visit. I understand that it is inconvenient for the patient and we try to make things convenient; but this is what the health plans require. I have actually had a particular health plan state that this is the way we should code, regardless of it being inconvenient to the patient. It's too bad, but physicians have to start looking at their bottom line!

I definitely advise people to look into the S0610 and S0612 for the gynecology visit, especially with BCBS. They will find the reimbursement rates are very good. Other health plans will reimburse the S-codes; however, Medicare will not. We are currently testing variations of coding combinations by payer to determine which is the most appropriate combination to bill by payer. This does take a lot of time on your staffs part, but it could be very cost effective if you are able to actually receive reimbursement for the services you are providing. When using the S0610/S0612, do not use the G0101 code, because they are pretty much the same code. However, I would code Q0091 in addition to the S-code if a screening pap smear was obtained.

These codes are controversial in the "coding" community; however, I firmly believe that there should be increased reimbursement for the well woman preventive exam. It truly troubles me that the Preventive Medicine codes are reimbursed the same for male and female patients. We have already established that it requires more time, more risk and requires supplies to perform the breast, pelvic and pap. The fact that some health plans want to bundle that into the Preventive Medicine exam is ridiculous! One of my goals is to inform more physicians about this and, eventually, the more physicians who take a stand, the more power we have to change the reimbursement by the health plans!

There are many physicians, billers and coders, who just accept whatever they can get as far as reimbursement. There is not enough time in a day to do appeals and really learn the various coding policies. One of the worst mistakes a physician can do is to under staff the billing department and/or not have billing people who have the means (resources) to stay abreast of all the inconsistencies in billing. The other problem that I see in our industry is that, coders especially, see only in "black and white". There is no "outside the box" for them. This is a detriment because, as we can see, the health plans do not know "black and white". Each health plan develops their own reimbursement policies that go against what coders learn. There are Medicare guidelines, CPT® guidelines, BCBS guidelines, UHC guidelines...I think you get the picture! When I talk with my physicians and billing/coding staff, I will clarify that I am referring to one guideline versus another.

Now, until all physicians, coders and billers can get on the same page and insist that the health plans reimburse for the services that the physicians perform, we are going nowhere and the health plans are holding the cards! I applaud physicians and their staff for seeking information and building their understanding of this part of the industry.

Thank you for allowing me to present by opinion on this subject.

Charlene Burgett, MS-HCM, CMA(AAMA), CPC, CCP, CMSCS, CPM
Administrator, North Scottsdale Family Medicine
POMAA National Advisory Board

charlene_burgett@yahoo.com


Invite me on LinkedIn:

http://www.linkedin.com/in/charleneburgett


Follow me on Twitter:

http://www.twitter.com/CharleneBurgett

###

Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us.  Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.


Latest articles:  (any category)

Medicare Updates -- SNF, Neurostimulators, Ambulance Fee Schedule and more (2022-10-20)
October 27th, 2022 - CMS - MLNConnects
Skilled Nursing Facility Provider Preview Reports: Review by November 14 - Help Your Patients Make Informed Health Care Decisions - Ambulance Fee Schedule: CY 2023 Ambulance Inflation Factor & Productivity Adjustment - Compliance - Implanted Spinal Neurostimulators: Document Medical Records - Claims, Pricers, & Codes...
2023 Evaluation & Management Updates Free Webinar
October 24th, 2022 - Aimee Wilcox
Congratulations on a successful 2021 implementation of the Evaluation and Management (E/M) changes! That was a big change, but now an even bigger change is headed your way for inpatient and all other E/M categories. How great is it that almost all of the E/M categories will now be scored based on medical decision making (MDM) or total provider time? Standardized scoring and one set of E/M guidelines has the potential of bringing about a change or improvement of provider fatigue due to over regulation and documentation burden.
Are Leading Queries Prohibited by Law or Lore?
October 13th, 2022 - Erica E. Remer
AHIMA released its CDI Practice Brief Monday. At Yom Kippur services, I found myself thinking about the question Dr. Ronald Hirsch posed to me the day before. My rabbi was talking in her sermon about the difference between halacha and minhag. Halacha is law; it is the prescriptions...
2023 ICD-10-CM Guideline Changes
October 13th, 2022 - Chris Woolstenhulme
View the ICD-10-CM Guideline Changes for 2023 Chapter 19 (Injury, poisoning, and certain other consequences of external causes [S00-T88])The guidelines clarify that coders do not need to see a change in the patient’s condition to assign an underdosing code. According to the updated guidelines, “Documentation that the patient is taking less ...
Z Codes: Understanding Palliative Care and Related Z Codes
October 11th, 2022 - Gloryanne Bryant
Palliative care is often considered to be hospice and comfort care. Palliative care is sometimes used interchangeably with “comfort care” and then again sometimes with “hospice care.”  But these terms do have slightly different meanings and sometimes the meaning varies depending on who is stating it. The National...
2023 ICD-10-CM Code Changes
October 6th, 2022 - Christine Woolstenhulme, CPC, CMRS, QCC, QMCS
In 2022 there were 159 new codes; the 2023 ICD-10-CM code update includes 1,176 new, 28 revised, and 287 deleted codes, a substantial change from last year. The 2023 ICD-10-CM codes are to be used for discharges from October 1, 2022 through September 30, 2023, and for patient encounters from ...
Yes, You Have What It Takes To Lead Your Practice And Your Profession
September 20th, 2022 - Kem Tolliver
If you’ve been in any healthcare role for more than two years, you’ve seen quite a bit of change. And guess what, it’s not over. We are living and working in uncertain times. This climate requires each of us to step outside of our comfort zones to lead exactly where we stand. It’s not required of one to have a “title” to lead. What is required, however, is a willingness to trust your instincts, look for answers and rely on your team.



Home About Contact Terms Privacy

innoviHealth® - 62 E 300 North, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 - Phone 801-770-4203 (9-5 Mountain)

Copyright © 2000-2022 innoviHealth Systems®, Inc. - CPT® copyright American Medical Association