Q/A: For E/M, How do I Count Tests Ordered in One Department and Performed in Another?

April 19th, 2021 - Aimee Wilcox, CPMA, CCS-P, CST, MA, MT, Director of Content

Question: I am in an ENT office as part of a large clinic with separate practices including audiology, CT, and allergy, all billing under the same TAX ID. Sometimes tests are ordered which are done in other departments that my office does not bill for, would those be considered an outside source?

Answer: This is a great question and one that has been asked by many coders and auditors. To answer it, we begin by looking at the following CPT definition for “External physician or other qualified healthcare professional” as noted in the AMA's Errata and Technical Corrections - CPT 2021 (emphasis added):

“An external physician or other qualified health care professional who is not in the same group practice or is of a different specialty or subspecialty. This includes licensed professionals who are practicing independently. The individual may also be a facility or organizational provider such as from a hospital, nursing facility, or home health care agency.”

If you are in a group practice and the physician/QHP who ordered the test is of the same specialty and subspecialty as your physician, then the answer to the question is NO, they would not be considered an outside source (external physician/QHP). However, if you are in a group practice and the physician/QHP who ordered the test is NOT of the same specialty or subspecialty, then the answer is YES, they are considered an outside source.

Another great example of simplifying this E/M guideline, and one that so many of us have been doing well for so long, is how we determine when a patient is considered new or established to a group practice. According to the CPT codebook:

“A new patient is one who has not received any professional services from the physician/qualified health care professional or another physician/qualified health care professional of the exact same specialty and subspecialty who belongs to the same group practice, within the past three years.”

If Dr. Jones (ENT) and Dr. Smith (family medicine) are in the same group practice and Dr. Smith refers one of her established patients to Dr. Jones for chronic ear infections, Dr. Jones would be able to charge a new patient encounter for the service because they are not of the same specialty nor are they of the same subspecialty.

The same is true for determining what tests can and cannot be scored as part of the E/M MDM data element. Here are a few examples:

Scenario: Dr. Jones (ENT) performs an E/M service on little Jimmy, a 2-year-old boy who presents with his parents today for evaluation of his ears, hearing, and developmental delay. His parents are with him and provide a comprehensive history for the provider. After examination, Dr. Jones feels it necessary to have the patient obtain an audiogram to determine possible conductive hearing loss and contacts John Paul Reiner, AuD (same building, same group practice) to see if he can squeeze little Jimmy in for an audiogram today. Dr. Reiner (different specialty) performs the audiogram, documents his professional interpretation into a report and sends the results, report, and little Jimmy back to Dr. Jones for the results.

Dr. Jones reviews the audiogram results and Dr. Reiner’s report and determines little Jimmy needs a CT to determine if there are any bony abnormalities within the ossicles that may be the cause of the conductive hearing loss, as there is no infection or fluid present in the inner ears. The results, assessment, and treatment plan are discussed with the patient’s parents, a CT scan is ordered, and a follow-up encounter scheduled in two weeks to go over the results and determine a plan of action for treating the conductive hearing loss.

Scoring

Dr. Jones can count three things in the MDM data element section:

Assessment requiring an Independent historian. The patient is 2-years old and cannot provide an adequate medical history so the parents provided that information to Dr. Jones.
Ordered and reviewed a test (audiogram). Remember that when you order a test and review the results on the same day, it is only scored once as part of the E/M encounter for that day. However, if you performed the professional component of the test then you cannot count it at all.
Ordered a test (CT scan). This is to be performed on a different day by the imaging center which you stated was billed separately as a different specialty/subspecialty for the professional and technical component of that test. When the patient returns for follow-up which includes the results of the CT, Dr. Jones will be able to count the review of a test (CT scan) as a single MDM data element from a single unique source.

NOTE: If Dr. Jones had an ENT practice where he employed a certified audiology technician to perform audiograms (technical portion) and then Dr. Jones interprets them, documents the findings in the E/M encounter note or a separate audiology report (professional interpretation), then Dr. Jones could NOT count order/review audiogram (test) in the MDM data element portion of the E/M service.

###

Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us. Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.

Latest articles: (any category)

COVID Vaccine Coding Changes as of November 1, 2023
October 26th, 2023 - Wyn Staheli

COVID vaccine changes due to the end of the PHE as of November 1, 2023 are addressed in this article.

Medicare Guidance Changes for E/M Services
October 11th, 2023 - Wyn Staheli

2023 brought quite a few changes to Evaluation and management (E/M) services. The significant revisions as noted in the CPT codebook were welcome changes to bring other E/M services more in line with the changes that took place with Office or Other Outpatient Services a few years ago. As part of CMS’ Medicare Learning Network, the “Evaluation and Management Services Guide” publication was finally updated as of August 2023 to include the changes that took place in 2023. If you take a look at the new publication (see references below),....

Can We Score Interpretation of an EKG Towards E/M Medical Decision Making?
October 10th, 2023 - Aimee Wilcox

When EKGs are performed in the facility setting or even in the physician's office, what are the requirements for reporting the service and who gets credit for scoring data points for Evaluation and Management (E/M) medical decision making (MDM)? Let's take a look at a few coding scenarios related to EKG services to get a better understanding of why this can be problematic.

Accurately Reporting Signs and Symptoms with ICD-10-CM Codes
October 5th, 2023 - Aimee Wilcox

Coders often find themselves unsure of when to report a sign or symptom code documented in the medical record. Some coders find their organization has an EHR that requires a working diagnosis, which is usually a sign or symptom, be entered to order a test or diagnostic study or image. Understanding the guidelines surrounding when signs and symptoms should be reported is the first step in correct coding so let's take a look at some scenarios.

The 2024 ICD-10-CM Updates Include New Codes for Reporting Metabolic Disorders and Insulin Resistance
September 19th, 2023 - Aimee Wilcox

Diabetes is a chronic disease that just seems to consistently be increasing instead of improving resulting in a constant endeavor by medical researchers to identify causal effects and possible treatments. One underlying or precipitating condition that scientists have identified as a precipitating factor in the development of diabetes is insulin resistance, which is a known metabolic disorder. As data becomes available through claims reporting, additional code options become possible with ICD-10-CM.

Documenting and Reporting Postoperative Visits
September 12th, 2023 - Aimee Wilcox

Sometimes we receive questions regarding documentation requirements for specific codes or coding requirements and we respond with information and resources to support our answers. The following question was recently submitted: Are providers required to report postoperative services on claims using 99024, especially if there is no payment for that service? What documentation is required if you are reporting an unrelated Evaluation and Management (E/M) service by the same physician during the postoperative period?

Understanding Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and ICD-10-CM Coding
August 22nd, 2023 - Aimee Wilcox

Gastroesophageal reflux disease or GERD for short, is a disease that impacts millions of Americans on a weekly basis. Symptoms are uncomfortable, as are some of the tests used to diagnose it, but understanding the disease, tests, and treatments helps us better understand how to code the disease using ICD-10-CM codes.