Inadequate Exclusion Screenings Could Put Your Practice at Risk

January 21st, 2020 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Categories:   Compliance   Chiropractic  
0 Votes - Sign in to vote or comment.

Exclusion screenings require far more than just checking a name on a federal database at the time you are hiring someone. Far too many providers don’t realize that in order to meet compliance requirements, there is MUCH more involved. Generally speaking, the definition of an exclusion screening would be checking a database to see if an individual has been excluded from participation in a particular program. However, there are also federal, state, and even payer requirements that need to be met when it comes to exclusion screenings.

Federal Exclusion Screening Requirement

Federal screening exclusion screening is the type that most providers have heard about. There are actually two federal databases with exclusion screening: 

Many providers have heard of using the LEIE to perform a CMS exclusion screening, but it is also necessary to do a GSA exclusion screening. 

In Chapter 3 — Compliance in both the ChiroCode DeskBook and our specialty-specific Reimbursement Guides, the portion covering some of the compliance laws states the following (emphasis added):

Exclusion Statute [42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7] Individuals who are specifically excluded from participation in federal healthcare programs because of a felony charge, patient abuse, and/or neglect, cannot participate in any federal (e.g., Medicare, TRICARE) or state (e.g., Medicaid) healthcare program — either directly or indirectly (through an employer or group practice). Exclusions extend beyond those providing direct patient care services. It can include those in executive positions (e.g., director, office manager) as well as volunteer or administrative positions (e.g., accounting, information technology services).

Penalty: Organizations who employ an individual listed in an Exclusions Database can be assessed Civil Monetary Penalties (CMP) of $10,000 for each item or service provided by the excluded individual and an assessment of up to three times the amount claimed for such items or services. It could also trigger False Claims Act penalties. Criminal penalties may also be pursued.

While $10,000 doesn’t seem like much, it can add up fast over a period of just a single year. Look at how many services your practice bills to Medicare. If you discover that you have a vendor that has been excluded, you could be facing significant fines. Be sure that you immediately disclose that you have discovered that you have contracted with an individual on an exclusion list. It might be best to contact a reputable healthcare attorney before doing so to ensure that you have excellent representation during this process.

State Exclusion Screening Requirements

The Affordable Care Act of 2010 also has a provision which mandates that you cannot employ a provider or supplier who has been terminated by Medicare or by another State's Medicaid program. If an individual is excluded in one state, they are excluded for ALL states. The catch here is that not all states report their exclusions to the federal exclusion database. That means that if you are only checking the federal database, then you are not meeting the requirement. You need to check exclusion lists for ALL states that maintain one. CLICK HERE to see a listing of those states. You can’t just check your own state because people move from state to state to avoid exclusions. 

Monthly Exclusion Screening

In 2013, the OIG issued an advisory which stated that “... providers should check the LEIE prior to employing or contracting with persons and periodically check the LEIE to determine the exclusion status of current employees and contractors.” So just what constitutes periodically? While the federal law does not specifically state how often an exclusion screening needs to be performed, according to Daniel Levinson, the Inspector General of HHS, healthcare organizations need to do this monthly because the records are updated monthly. This includes checking the state exclusion lists.

Note: It is critical to document your monthly exclusion screening efforts in your organization’s compliance log.

Commercial Payer Compliance Requires Exclusion Screening

Even if you do not participate in a federal program like Medicare or Medicaid, many commercial payer contracts have clauses about compliance. Be sure you know what your contracts say about exclusion screenings, particularly if you have an evergreen contract or haven’t thoroughly reviewed contracts recently. For example, the United HealthGroup compliance page has a section which states that exclusion screening must be done monthly and you must check both federal and state exclusion lists.

Simplify Exclusion Screening with an Exclusion Screening Company

With over 40 exclusion screening databases/lists to check, this can become a time consuming process. There are several exclusion screening companies using specialized software that offer services which can simplify this process. Keep in mind that if you do employ this type of service, you (not the screening company) are still legally responsible for all exclusion violations. The nice thing about using these companies is that they update their software and maintain current information so you don’t have to.

To help providers, we have partnered with a company called Exclusion Screening and currently have a promotion which will save you quite a bit of money. CLICK HERE to see how you can save money and time as you improve your compliance efforts.

###

Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us.  Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.


Latest articles:  (any category)

2020 Medicare Part D Coverage Gap (AKA donut hole)
March 26th, 2020 - Chris Woolstenhulme, QCC, CMCS, CPC, CMRS
Not every Medicare drug plan has complete coverage for prescription drugs - most have some sort of coverage gap, known as the “Donut Hole”. The coverage gap is a temporary limit on coverage under the drug plan. This coverage gap will not affect everyone and begins after you have used ...
LATEST COVID-19 INFORMATION FOR BILLING NON-FACE-TO-FACE SERVICES
March 26th, 2020 - Namas
Healthcare providers and the population at large are concerned about safe access to care considering the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, we have received many inquiries this week about how to bill for “telehealth” services. Let’s first address that true telehealth services have some pretty stringent requirements from CMS, including that ...
COVID-19: Cybercrime, Telehealth, and Coding
March 25th, 2020 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Your inbox is probably like mine with all sorts of announcements about COVID-19. Here are just a few reminders of things we felt should be passed along. We have heard of several cases of cybercrime related to this outbreak. For example, there was a coronavirus map which loads malware onto your ...
Understand the New Codes for Testing & Reporting the COVID-19 Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2)
March 21st, 2020 - Aimee Wilcox, CPMA, CCS-P, CST, MA, MT, Director of Content
The current coronavirus pandemic refers to COVID-19, a novel or new type of coronavirus known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). The first victim of the virus was identified in Wuhan, Hubei, China at the end of 2019. There is no immunization available to prevent it from spreading and ...
Implementing Telehealth Visits
March 20th, 2020 - Namas
The following is a step-by-step guide on how to convert office-based encounters to telehealth encounters during the current COVID-19 pandemic. These rules may change post-pandemic, as many changes relaxing existing rules were made on a temporary basis by CMS and commercial payers to facilitate patient access and minimize risk of infection. Step ...
Additional Coronavirus Testing Code Announced
March 17th, 2020 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
On March 13, 2020, a new CPT code was announced by the American Medical Association (AMA) who maintains the CPT code set. This early release of a CPT code is rare and is effective immediately.
The difference between Jones and Proximal Diaphyseal Fractures of the Fifth Metatarsal (2018-10-23)
March 5th, 2020 - Chris Woolstenhulme, QCC, CMCS, CPC, CMRS
Distinguishing the difference between Jones and Proximal Diaphyseal Fractures of the Fifth Metatarsal can be complicated, here are some examples from PubMed;  A Jones fracture currently is defined as an acute fracture of the fifth metatarsal at the junction between the proximal diaphysis and metaphysis of the fifth metatarsal without distal extension beyond the fourth to fifth intermetatarsal articulation. Tuberosity avulsion fracture (also known as pseudo-Jones fracture or dancer's fracture) A proximal diaphyseal fifth ...



About Codapedia by innoviHealth® Contact Us Terms of Use Privacy Policy Advertise with Us

innoviHealth® - 62 E 300 North, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 - Phone 801-770-4203 (9-5 Mountain)

Copyright © 2000-2020 innoviHealth Systems®, Inc. - CPT® copyright American Medical Association