Revised ABN Requirements Still Fuzzy

March 18th, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research

Categories: Medicare Documentation Guidelines

Although it has been quite some time since ChiroCode published an article about the revised instructions for non-participating providers who use the ABN, there are still some outstanding questions about this change. So far, Medicare has not provided additional guidance about this question despite requests by us for clarification.

Medicare now requires non-participating providers to include the following highlighted statement in the (H) Additional Information section (see this article for more information about this requirement):

“This supplier doesn’t accept payment from Medicare for the item(s) listed in the table above. If I checked Option 1 above, I am responsible for paying the supplier’s charge for the item(s) directly to the supplier. If Medicare does pay, Medicare will pay me the Medicare-approved amount for the item(s), and this payment to me may be less than the supplier’s charge.”

It should be noted that Medicare's stated reason for this change was to clarify the instructions for Option 3. They stated the following regarding the problem with conflicting information on an unassigned claim (emphasis added [see References]):

The last sentence of Option 1 states, “If Medicare does pay, you will refund any payments I made to you, less co-pay or deductibles.” This statement could be true for assigned claims. However, if the claim is submitted as unassigned and the claim is determined to be payable, Medicare makes payment directly to the beneficiary for the Medicare allowed amount as payment in full. Contrary to the highlighted statement above, a refund from the supplier to the beneficiary would not be required for an unassigned claim. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has not received any comments or questions on the ABN as it applies to unassigned claims until recently when an industry representative asked for clarification. Although the current form instructions allow for insertion of any additional information, we would like to add instructions specific to non-participating suppliers and providers who are enrolled with Medicare.

There still is an outstanding question, in the minds of some, regarding the official instructions for the ABN form for non-par providers. The title to the instructions mentions both suppliers and providers (bold emphasis added):

Special guidance ONLY for non-participating suppliers and providers (those who don’t accept Medicare assignment):

That part is clear, but in the wording that these non-par providers are supposed to include in box H, it does not mention professional services — only supplier and item. This required wording makes it sound like the instructions are only for suppliers. This is what it says (bold emphasis added):

When this sentence is stricken, the supplier shall include the following CMS-approved unassigned claim statement in the (H) Additional Information section.

“This supplier doesn’t accept payment from Medicare for the item(s) listed in the table above. If I checked Option 1 above, I am responsible for paying the supplier’s charge for the item(s) directly to the supplier. If Medicare does pay, Medicare will pay me the Medicare-approved amount for the item(s), and this payment to me may be less than the supplier’s charge.”

So that makes it sound like these instructions only apply to suppliers of supplies -- NOT services supplied by providers. This could be confusing to patients because when they read this it sounds like they are getting some sort of supply. According to one consultant, sometimes providers have been referred to as suppliers by Medicare. Therefore, this might require explaining to the patient that the item(s) listed are referring to your non-covered service(s).

The official instructions state that "An ABN with the Option 1 sentence stricken must contain the CMS-approved unassigned claim statement as written above to be considered valid notice." Therefore, do NOT change the wording to say supplier/provider or provider in place of supplier. You must use the official wording for the ABN to be valid.

###

Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us. Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.

Latest articles: (any category)

COVID Vaccine Coding Changes as of November 1, 2023
October 26th, 2023 - Wyn Staheli

COVID vaccine changes due to the end of the PHE as of November 1, 2023 are addressed in this article.

Medicare Guidance Changes for E/M Services
October 11th, 2023 - Wyn Staheli

2023 brought quite a few changes to Evaluation and management (E/M) services. The significant revisions as noted in the CPT codebook were welcome changes to bring other E/M services more in line with the changes that took place with Office or Other Outpatient Services a few years ago. As part of CMS’ Medicare Learning Network, the “Evaluation and Management Services Guide” publication was finally updated as of August 2023 to include the changes that took place in 2023. If you take a look at the new publication (see references below),....

Can We Score Interpretation of an EKG Towards E/M Medical Decision Making?
October 10th, 2023 - Aimee Wilcox

When EKGs are performed in the facility setting or even in the physician's office, what are the requirements for reporting the service and who gets credit for scoring data points for Evaluation and Management (E/M) medical decision making (MDM)? Let's take a look at a few coding scenarios related to EKG services to get a better understanding of why this can be problematic.

Accurately Reporting Signs and Symptoms with ICD-10-CM Codes
October 5th, 2023 - Aimee Wilcox

Coders often find themselves unsure of when to report a sign or symptom code documented in the medical record. Some coders find their organization has an EHR that requires a working diagnosis, which is usually a sign or symptom, be entered to order a test or diagnostic study or image. Understanding the guidelines surrounding when signs and symptoms should be reported is the first step in correct coding so let's take a look at some scenarios.

The 2024 ICD-10-CM Updates Include New Codes for Reporting Metabolic Disorders and Insulin Resistance
September 19th, 2023 - Aimee Wilcox

Diabetes is a chronic disease that just seems to consistently be increasing instead of improving resulting in a constant endeavor by medical researchers to identify causal effects and possible treatments. One underlying or precipitating condition that scientists have identified as a precipitating factor in the development of diabetes is insulin resistance, which is a known metabolic disorder. As data becomes available through claims reporting, additional code options become possible with ICD-10-CM.

Documenting and Reporting Postoperative Visits
September 12th, 2023 - Aimee Wilcox

Sometimes we receive questions regarding documentation requirements for specific codes or coding requirements and we respond with information and resources to support our answers. The following question was recently submitted: Are providers required to report postoperative services on claims using 99024, especially if there is no payment for that service? What documentation is required if you are reporting an unrelated Evaluation and Management (E/M) service by the same physician during the postoperative period?

Understanding Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and ICD-10-CM Coding
August 22nd, 2023 - Aimee Wilcox

Gastroesophageal reflux disease or GERD for short, is a disease that impacts millions of Americans on a weekly basis. Symptoms are uncomfortable, as are some of the tests used to diagnose it, but understanding the disease, tests, and treatments helps us better understand how to code the disease using ICD-10-CM codes.