Is COVID-19 Causing Risk Adjustment “Gotcha’s”?

August 27th, 2020 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Categories:   Covid-19  

The COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) has created some possible problems when it comes to risk adjustment. Be sure your organization has implemented policies and procedures to try and overcome these new hurdles.

Insufficient Management of Patients with Chronic Conditions

Some have expressed concerns that patients with chronic conditions have not been coming in for regular visits. Because of this, these patients might not have an appropriate RAF score due to the lack of clinical visits. More importantly, they may not be receiving the care that they need to adequately manage their conditions which leads to poor patient outcomes and increased costs. Consider working with providers to help them identify their patients with chronic conditions to make sure they get the visits that they need to both care for them and document the management of their conditions. If the patient is worried about in-person visits, then encourage telehealth options (see below).

Difficulty Obtaining Medical Records

In an effort to control COVID-19 exposure, many organizations have cut office hours (or have been closed for long periods of time) and changed work staffing (e.g., alternating shifts). An unexpected consequence of this is that some risk adjustment reviewers have reported that it has become more difficult to obtain patient records than it was previously. This may result in reporting delays. Contact reviewers and if this has been a problem, work with them to create a plan to make this process a little easier.

Does Telehealth Count? 

This is the big question. Does telehealth count or not? To answer that question, look at the following Q/A from the CMS COVID-19 FAQ document (emphasis added):

Question: Will diagnoses from telehealth visits be used in the CMS-HCC risk scores used in program calculations for ACOs? Are ACOs included in the ‘other organizations’ that may submit diagnoses codes that are referenced in the 4/10/2020 HPMS memo that addressed the applicability of diagnoses from telehealth visits for [sic] purpose of risk adjustment?

Answer: CMS calculates risk scores for all Medicare beneficiaries, and uses the final CMSHCC risk scores calculated for FFS beneficiaries in ACO program calculations; the Medicare Shared Savings Program and existing CMMI ACO models do not calculate separate CMSHCC risk scores for these ACO initiatives. Final CMS-HCC risk scores will include telehealth visits when those visits meet all criteria for risk adjustment eligibility, which include being from an allowable inpatient, outpatient, or professional service. Diagnoses resulting from telehealth services can meet the risk adjustment face-to-face requirement when the services are provided using an interactive audio and video telecommunications system that permits real-time interactive communication.

While Medicare Advantage organizations submit diagnoses for their enrollees, CMS calculates the risk scores of FFS beneficiaries, including those assigned to ACOs, with those diagnoses that are submitted on claims by FFS providers, and that meet risk adjustment criteria. CMS uses the information on these FFS claims to determine whether diagnoses are risk adjustment eligible, including those from telehealth visits. In other words, when diagnoses from applicable telehealth visits meet the risk adjustment criteria, they will be used in calculating risk scores for FFS beneficiaries. The 4/10/20 HPMS memo was referring to plans that submit diagnoses on behalf of their enrollees, and that submit data to the Risk Adjustment Processing System (RAPS) or Encounter Data System (EDS) for purposes of calculating risk scores. Because beneficiaries participating in ACOs are FFS beneficiaries, and CMS uses diagnoses from FFS claims to calculate their risk scores, ACOs are not considered ‘other organizations’ and do not submit data to RAPS or EDS for purposes of calculating risk scores.

CMS also published a document entitled “Risk Adjustment Telehealth and Telephone Services During COVID-19 FAQs” on  April 27, 2020 which was later updated on August 3, 2020. This document clarifies which codes may be submitted for risk adjustment data submissions. It states “Any service provided through telehealth that is reimbursable under applicable state law and otherwise meets applicable risk adjustment data submission standards…” is considered valid for data submission for the 2020 benefit year.

Even though Medicare is allowing a telephone call to be reimbursed as an E/M visit during the PHE, it is clear that when it comes to risk adjustment, the rules are not the same. There will need to be a face-to-face encounter, which can be done via telehealth as long as all applicable rules are met (as outlined above). This encounter does not need to have a recording of the encounter, but it is essential that the documentation clearly states that this encounter was conducted via telehealth using video and audio telecommunications and was not just a phone call. 

###

Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us.  Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.


Latest articles:  (any category)

Reporting Drug Wastage with Modifier JW and NEW Modifier JZ
August 15th, 2023 - Aimee Wilcox
Modifier JW has been around since 2003 with changes in Medicare policies to ensure standard utilization in 2017; however, because of a continued lack of reporting consistency, Medicare has created and implemented policy related to reporting a new modifier, JZ. How does this impact Medicare reimbursement and why is this modifier so important?
Finding Patterns of Complexity in the Medical Decision Making (MDM) Table
August 8th, 2023 - Aimee Wilcox
Changes to the Medical Decision Making (MDM) Table in 2023 reflect the work performed in the facility setting in addition to the work involved in Evaluation and Management (E/M) scoring in other places of service. Taking the time to really look closely at the MDM Table and identify patterns in wording and scoring helps coders to understand scoring in an easier way.
Seven Reasons to Standardize Medical Records
July 18th, 2023 - Aimee Wilcox
The standardization of medical records offers numerous benefits for healthcare systems, providers, and patients. By ensuring interoperability, improved workflows, better patient safety, supporting research endeavors, and optimizing resource allocation, standardized records contribute to improved efficiency, quality of care and especially patient outcomes. Here are seven reasons to standardize medical records.
Advancements in Coding Hospital Observation Care Services in 2023
July 4th, 2023 - Aimee Wilcox
Hospitals are increasingly adopting innovative solutions to improve patient care and optimize processes and many of these solutions follow immediately the recent CPT and Medicare coding changes.  In 2023 coding of hospital observation care services underwent significant changes enabling healthcare providers to accurately document and bill for the sick or injured patient that requires a higher level of medical services between the emergency room care and hospital admission. This article explores the key changes in coding hospital observation care services and their impact on healthcare delivery.
Be Aware — Emergency Department Visits Under OIG Scrutiny
June 20th, 2023 - Wyn Staheli
Every year the Department of Health & Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) creates an official work plan giving everyone a heads up as to what they are going to be reviewing. The 2022 Work Plan stated that they would be reviewing claims for Evaluation & Management services provided in an emergency department (ED) setting.
OIG Audit Reveals Diagnosis Reporting Problems Affecting Risk Adjustment Scoring
June 15th, 2023 - Wyn Staheli
The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) recently published their Spring 2023 Semiannual Report to Congress. This report contained some diagnoses reporting issues that all providers need to be aware of. They focused on several groups of diagnoses that they considered “High-Risk” for being miscoded. Several states were included in the report and the types of errors for all can be generally grouped into several categories.
Documenting for Suture and Staple Removal E/M Add-On Codes
May 30th, 2023 - Aimee Wilcox
Historically, the 10-day and 90-day global periods would include the patient's follow-up Evaluation and Management (E/M) services and any dressing changes or staple/suture removal related to the surgery; however, following a closer analysis of these and other surgery codes, the decision was made to make significant revisions to these codes to ensure proper reporting.



Home About Terms Privacy

innoviHealth® - 62 E 300 North, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 - Phone 801-770-4203 (9-5 Mountain)

Copyright © 2000-2023 innoviHealth Systems®, Inc. - CPT® copyright American Medical Association