Two surgeons operating on the same patient, same session

March 18th, 2009 - Codapedia Editor
Categories:   Coding   Modifiers   Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFSDB)   Surgical Billing & Coding  

Most surgeries with two surgeons are reported and performed as the primary surgeon (no modifier on the CPT® code) and the assistant surgeon (modifiers 80, 81, 82, and AS).  Some surgeries, however, require two surgeons (modifier 62)  or a surgical team (modifier 66).  How does a physician or coder know if the surgery is eligible to be paid in this way?  Although commercial payment policies may vary, Medicare has a policy.  See the CPT® book for the complete descriptions of these modifiers.

The Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Data Base has two indicators for these topics.  Each surgical CPT® code has an indicator for whether or not two surgeons are allowed or whethe or not team surgeons are allowed for highly complex patients.  Before submitting claims in this way, check the Medicare Fee Schedule indicators to see if two or team surgeons are: allowed, never allowed, allowed with supporting medical documentation.  ( A link to the CMS site with a look up function for indicators is in the citations section of this article.)

For two surgeons, both surgeons submit the claim with the same CPT® code and append modifier 62 to their claim.  Each is paid 62.5% of the Medicare fee schedule amount. 

Here is the section from the Medicare Claims Processing Manual with the instructions: (Pub 100-04, Chapter 12, Section 40.8.B)

A.  General
Under some circumstances, the individual skills of two or more surgeons are required to
perform surgery on the same patient during the same operative session.  This may be
required because of the complex nature of the procedure(s) and/or the patient’s condition. 
In these cases, the additional physicians are not acting as assistants-at-surgery.
B.  Billing Instructions
The following billing procedures apply when billing for a surgical procedure or
procedures that required the use of two surgeons or a team of surgeons:
• If two surgeons (each in a different specialty) are required to perform a specific
procedure, each surgeon bills for the procedure with a modifier “-62.”  Co-surgery
also refers to surgical procedures involving two surgeons performing the parts of
the procedure simultaneously, i.e., heart transplant or bilateral knee replacements. 
Documentation of the medical necessity for two surgeons is required for certain
services identified in the MFSDB.  (See §40.8.C.5.);
• If a team of surgeons (more than 2 surgeons of different specialties) is required to
perform a specific procedure, each surgeon bills for the procedure with a modifier
“-66.”  Field 25 of the MFSDB identifies certain services submitted with a “-66”
modifier which must be sufficiently documented to establish that a team was
medically necessary.  All claims for team surgeons must contain sufficient
information to allow pricing “by report.” 
• If surgeons of different specialties are each performing a different procedure (with
specific CPT® codes), neither co-surgery nor multiple surgery rules apply (even if
the procedures are performed through the same incision).  If one of the surgeons
performs multiple procedures, the multiple procedure rules apply to that surgeon’s
services.  (See §40.6 for multiple surgery payment rules.)
For co-surgeons (modifier 62), the fee schedule amount applicable to the payment for
each co-surgeon is 62.5 percent of the global surgery fee schedule amount.  Team
surgery (modifier 66) is paid for on a “By Report” basis.
 

###

Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us.  Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.


Latest articles:  (any category)

Finding Patterns of Complexity in the Medical Decision Making (MDM) Table
August 8th, 2023 - Aimee Wilcox
Changes to the Medical Decision Making (MDM) Table in 2023 reflect the work performed in the facility setting in addition to the work involved in Evaluation and Management (E/M) scoring in other places of service. Taking the time to really look closely at the MDM Table and identify patterns in wording and scoring helps coders to understand scoring in an easier way.
Seven Reasons to Standardize Medical Records
July 18th, 2023 - Aimee Wilcox
The standardization of medical records offers numerous benefits for healthcare systems, providers, and patients. By ensuring interoperability, improved workflows, better patient safety, supporting research endeavors, and optimizing resource allocation, standardized records contribute to improved efficiency, quality of care and especially patient outcomes. Here are seven reasons to standardize medical records.
Advancements in Coding Hospital Observation Care Services in 2023
July 4th, 2023 - Aimee Wilcox
Hospitals are increasingly adopting innovative solutions to improve patient care and optimize processes and many of these solutions follow immediately the recent CPT and Medicare coding changes.  In 2023 coding of hospital observation care services underwent significant changes enabling healthcare providers to accurately document and bill for the sick or injured patient that requires a higher level of medical services between the emergency room care and hospital admission. This article explores the key changes in coding hospital observation care services and their impact on healthcare delivery.
Be Aware — Emergency Department Visits Under OIG Scrutiny
June 20th, 2023 - Wyn Staheli
Every year the Department of Health & Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) creates an official work plan giving everyone a heads up as to what they are going to be reviewing. The 2022 Work Plan stated that they would be reviewing claims for Evaluation & Management services provided in an emergency department (ED) setting.
OIG Audit Reveals Diagnosis Reporting Problems Affecting Risk Adjustment Scoring
June 15th, 2023 - Wyn Staheli
The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) recently published their Spring 2023 Semiannual Report to Congress. This report contained some diagnoses reporting issues that all providers need to be aware of. They focused on several groups of diagnoses that they considered “High-Risk” for being miscoded. Several states were included in the report and the types of errors for all can be generally grouped into several categories.
Documenting for Suture and Staple Removal E/M Add-On Codes
May 30th, 2023 - Aimee Wilcox
Historically, the 10-day and 90-day global periods would include the patient's follow-up Evaluation and Management (E/M) services and any dressing changes or staple/suture removal related to the surgery; however, following a closer analysis of these and other surgery codes, the decision was made to make significant revisions to these codes to ensure proper reporting.
Are you Properly Reporting Radiology Services?
May 23rd, 2023 - Wyn Staheli
It’s probably not surprising that the most commonly billed imaging services are radiologic examinations of the humerus, spine, fingers, and abdomen (codes 72070, 73140, 73060, 74019). However, there are currently 653 CPT codes in the main imaging section (70000-79999). Therefore, it’s worth it to take a few moments to review some important information about these services to ensure that proper coding (including the correct use of modifiers) takes place. This can help your organization ensure correct coding and reimbursement and thus minimize the chances for claim denials and payer take-backs (post-payment denials).



Home About Terms Privacy

innoviHealth® - 62 E 300 North, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 - Phone 801-770-4203 (9-5 Mountain)

Copyright © 2000-2023 innoviHealth Systems®, Inc. - CPT® copyright American Medical Association