So you’ve read the descriptions for both Modifiers 52 and 53, but you’re still on the fence as to which one is appropriate for a certain surgical case. This brief article will try to better differentiate between these two often-confused modifiers.
Modifier 53 is appropriate when a procedure is discontinued due to “an extenuating circumstance or one that threatens the well-being of the patient,” and this physician decision always happens after the procedure has begun in cases where Modifier 53 is appropriate. Often times the decision is made so early in the procedure that only an initial incision has been made but no specific work (as stated in the description of the code that was to have been used) has been accomplished. A re-scheduling of the entire procedure will often be necessary once the reason for the termination is evaluated and resolved, as the original reason for the surgery still exists and still needs surgical treatment.
Modifier 52 is used when a physician elects to partially reduce or eliminate a procedure, often (but not always) making this decision before the procedure has even begun. However, something (usually the majority of the work included in the description of the code) is still accomplished in situations where Modifier 52 is appropriate. In some cases, performance of the “reduced” or “eliminated” portion may be done at a later surgery. In other cases, this omitted portion of the service will not be performed at a subsequent operation. Performance of the omitted portion may not be possible because the structure is no longer present (was previously excised) or it is not simply not medically necessary to do this portion of the service.
Here’s where it can get a bit confusing: It is possible that a decision could be made by the physician mid-procedure, after doing the majority of the work described by a code, to “eliminate” what was to have been the final part or a procedure, essentially “discontinuing” a surgery before accomplishing all of the work listed in the code description, and this is where some question whether Modifier 53 should appropriately be reported instead of 52. However, a physician electing to eliminate the last portion of a procedure for a reason other than an extenuating circumstance/one that threatens the well-being of a patient should still be coded with Modifier 52, notwithstanding the fact that this decision to “eliminate” a portion of the service could constitute a “discontinuation” in a certain sense of the word.
If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us. Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.
The OIG conducted a study dated June 2019 wherein they indicated that there were approximately $269 million in overpayments for polysomnography services for the period of 2014 through 2015. According to the OIG “These errors occurred because the CMS oversight of polysomnography services was insufficient to ensure that providers complied with Medicare requirements and to prevent payment of claims that didn’t meet those requirements.”
So what are those requirements?
Medicare Advantage is the fastest growing form of government-funded healthcare and the rate of fraud within this segment has come under increased scrutiny. Funding is determined by the health status of each beneficiary; therefore, accurate coding based on detailed documentation makes the medical record vital to the process because some ...
Implants can be costly to the patient and the provider, and it is crucial to understand how to bill a patient’s medical insurance to ensure there is adequate coverage for the best treatment. Implants are commonly billed in a dental office under a patient’s medical benefits.
Implants could be considered ...
The “Medicare Advance Written Notices of Non-coverage” booklet, published by CMS’s Medicare Learning Network, was updated. This article discusses the changes to this booklet regarding the use of the ABN.
Properly documenting and coding chronic pain can be challenging. As is commonly the case with many conditions, over the years, there has been a shift in the identification of different types of pain, including chronic pain. Understanding where we are now and where we are going will help your organization prepare for the future by changing documentation patterns now.
CMS recently announced the 53 Direct Contracting Entities (DCEs) that will be participating in the April 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021 Global and Professional Direct Contracting (GPDC) Model. Among those participating is Clover Health Partners, who runs an in-home primary care program that has the potential to help Medicare ...