Noting "Noncontributory" for Past Medical, Family, Social History - Is It Acceptable?

May 29th, 2019 - Aimee Wilcox, CPMA, CCS-P, CST, MA, MT, Director of Content
Categories:   CPT® Coding   Chiropractic   Billing   Evaluation & Management (E/M)   Documentation Guidelines  
0 Votes - Sign in to vote or comment.

It is always a low point when a new patient's condition is marked down from 99205 to 99204 because the family history wasn't correctly documented, even when the patient's medical condition is obviously severe enough to warrant the higher level of service. Often when this occurs, it is because the provider documented the family history as noncontributory, negative, or unremarkable and the payer won't accept it for credit for lack of clarity.  

Well, it depends on which payer you are and also if you are the documenting provider, what you meant by it. If you look closely, you can see how the words, noncontributory, unremarkable, or negative can cause the reader to question what the provider meant by them. Was the provider trying to say, the family history was reviewed and none of the patient's family history has any relevance to the condition the patient is suffering from today? Or, did the provider mean the family history wasn't even looked at today because it isn't pertinent to any decision making being done at this encounter? 

Because there can be a dual meaning, some payers have published policies addressing this exact issue. For example, Palmetto GBA published the following question and answer about this issue:

"Q. Is it acceptable to use "noncontributory, unremarkable, or negative" when reporting past, family, or social history?" with the following statement: 

A: No, because the statement "noncontributory, unremarkable, or negative" does not indicate what was addressed. Did the nurse or physician ask specific conditions (i.e., any family history of coronary artery disease)? If for some reason you cannot obtain the family history, the documentation must support the reason why (e.g., the patient was adopted)."

However, other Medicare Administrative Contractors (MAC) have differing guidelines, such as Novitas, which also answered the question for their providers as follows:

"8. Under limited circumstances, could we use “noncontributory” as appropriate documentation to support the ROS and family history sections of the history component of an E/M?

There may be circumstances where the term "noncontributory" may be appropriate documentation when referring to the ROS and/or family history sections of the history component of an E/M service. Under the E/M documentation guidelines, it is noted that, "those systems with positive or pertinent negative responses must be individually documented. For the remaining systems, a notation indicating all other systems are negative is permissible. In the absence of such a notation, at least ten systems must be individually documented." The use of the term "noncontributory" may be permissible documentation when referring to the remaining negative review of systems.

The term "noncontributory" may also be appropriate documentation when referring to a patient's family history during an E/M visit, if the family history is not pertinent to the presenting problem." 

The variations in the meaning of these singular words is apparent when we compare the response by these two MACs. Additionally, how much time is going to be spent to make these corrections based on which carrier says it is okay compared to those that don't. It is obvious the best strategy is to change the documentation process for all to remove any doubt about the intended meaning.

Some providers have already done this by simply identifying the questions they want to know about a patient's family history that may have a bearing on their diagnosis and treatment of them. For example, 

An orthopedic surgeon may state, "Denies any family history of rheumatoid arthritis," while a cardiologist may state, "Family history unremarkable for heart disease in parents." A behavioral health specialist may state, "Denies family history of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder" or even be a little more general, "denies any family history of substance abuse or mental illness."

By making the statement an obvious answer to a question posed, the provider can avoid any potential conflict that may arise no matter which payer is auditing the claim.

###

Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us.  Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.


Latest articles:  (any category)

CMS and HHS Tighten Enrollment Rules and Increase Penalties
October 1st, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
This ruling impacts what providers and suppliers are required to disclose to be considered eligible to participate in Medicare, Medicaid, and Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP). The original proposed rule came out in 2016 and this final rule will go into effect on November 4, 2019. There have been known problems ...
Federal Workers Compensation Information
October 1st, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
When federal employees sustain work-related injuries, it does not go through state workers compensation insurance. You must be an enrolled provider to provide services or supplies. The following are some recommended links for additional information about this program. Division of Federal Employees' Compensation (DFEC) website Division of Federal Employees' Compensation (DFEC) provider ...
E-Health is a Big Deal in 2020
September 16th, 2019 - Chris Woolstenhulme, QCC, CMCS, CPC, CMRS
The new 2020 CPT codes are on the way! We are going to see 248 new codes, 71 deletions, and 75 revisions. Health monitoring and e-visits are getting attention; 6 new codes play a vital part in patients taking a part in their care from their own home. New patient-initiated ...
Chiropractic 2020 Codes Changes Are Here
September 9th, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
There are some interesting coding changes which chiropractic offices will want to know about. Are codes that you are billing changing?
Q/A: Is the Functional Rating Index by Evidence-Based Chiropractic Valid?
September 9th, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Question Is the Functional Rating Index, from the Institute of Evidence-Based Chiropractic, valid and acceptable? Or do we have to use Oswestry and NDI? Answer You can use any outcome assessment questionnaire that has been normalized and vetted for the target population and can be scored so you can compare the results from ...
List of Cranial Nerves
September 3rd, 2019 - Find-A-Code
Cranial nerves are involved with some of our senses such as vision, hearing and taste, others control certain muscles in the head and neck. There are twelve pairs of cranial nerves that lead from the brain to the head, neck and trunk. Below is a list of Cranial Nerves and ...
So How Do I Get Paid for This? APC, OPPS, IPPS, DRG?
August 21st, 2019 - Chris Woolstenhulme, QCC, CMCS, CPC, CMRS
You know how to find a procedure code and you may even know how to do the procedure, but where does the reimbursement come from?  It seems to be a mystery to many of us, so let's clear up some common confusion and review some of the main reimbursement systems.  One of the ...



About Codapedia by InnoviHealth Systems Contact Us Terms of Use Privacy Policy Advertise with Us

Codapedia™ by InnoviHealth Systems™ - 62 E 300 North, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 - Phone 801-770-4203 (9-5 Mountain) - Fax (801) 770-4428

Copyright © 2009-2019 Find A Code, LLC - CPT® copyright American Medical Association